- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
9.9 Mediaworx Pvt. Ltd.
- 9.9 Mediaworx Pvt. Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spammy article about non-notable company WuhWuzDat 18:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator - nothing of note here, not much above the level of a G11 speedy deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In fact, I prodded it once, but it appears not to have taken. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Absthebest, the only significant editor, removed the prod template with this edit, giving no edit summary. Thryduulf (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.