- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 07:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
2020 Spring UPSL season
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2020 Spring UPSL season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY, WP:NSEASONS and doesn't meet WP:GNG NZFC(talk)(cont) 06:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NZFC(talk)(cont) 06:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, non-notable. GiantSnowman 11:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom
and previous consensus against creating them for non-FPLs. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC), it just isn't notable. Previous reason was incorrect, so I struck it, but no evidence of being remotely close to passing WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC) - Strong Delete the most recent discussion about this sort of season was overturned with what I believe was completely inadequate reasoning and basis in policy (closer of overturn argued based on the "flow of discussion" as the reason for overturning). Agree with nom, none of NFOOTY, NSEASONS, or GNG are met. Sourcing is actually significantly worse (almost non-existent) than the article for the previous discussion, and is unlikely to receive significant coverage i.e. non-routine for the season as a whole. Seems like a pretty clear delete to me, despite the previous overturn. Jay eyem (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.