- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SNOW delete Jclemens (talk) 06:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2012 California earthquake
- 2012 California earthquake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A shiny example of WP:CRYSTAL that speculates on the possibility of an earthquake in two years. The references cited here do not meet WP:RS requirements. Warrah (talk) 02:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge This article is supposed to deal with a movie scene from the movie 2012. If it cannot be a standalone article, it should be merged with the main movie title. The same goes with 2012 Las Vegas earthquake. GVnayR (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An earthquake could also occur in 2010, 2011, 2013, ... So? Clarityfiend (talk) 03:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment In Demolition Man, they said that a big earthquake occured in 2010. Since you never see the earthquake in that film, you could say it was just a quirky element in the film. The California earthquake in the 2012 film is neither quirky nor non-notable. GVnayR (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 03:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No one knows the next earthquake to occur in California, so this might be a hoax. Décembër21st2012Freâk Talk at 03:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. If by some chance the movie plot element is enough to have an article- and I don't think it is- it shouldn't be at the title, of the format used for real events. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable element of a boring film. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yawn. By yawn, I mean delete per nom. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 05:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteBring down thehousearticle Miserably fails WP:CRYSTAL. Or possibly merge to 2012 (film). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.