- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 600 (number)#620s. Sandstein 09:07, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
620 (number)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 620 (number) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim to notability, no references. Fails WP:NUMBER. UtopianPoyzin (talk) 17:36, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- speedy delete the Article. I think no reason needed but it's not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forest90 (talk • contribs)
- Merge with 600 (number)#620s. Probably there, rather than at 620 (number). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Rollback to its original purpose as a redirect per Arthur Rubin. The page has virtually no information on the number, there is more at the redirect target. The only other purpose the page serves is to disambiguate 620 film which would be better served as a hatnote to 620. SpinningSpark 00:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to 600 (number)#620s. Per nom, this fails WP:NUMBER, and I don't see what content there is to merge into the intended target, considering that an entire section consists of a link to the intended target without any standalone content. ComplexRational (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.