Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
Tech News: 2022-10
21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day!
Tech News: 2022-11
22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Another Sock
@Mz7: Another Sock User:Itcouldbepossible from this SPI Archives Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MMartist365. 117.227.109.165 (talk) 10:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-12
15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
Tech News: 2022-13
19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Question about a recent comment
Hello Mz7, I have a question regarding your [14] recent comment on a sockpuppet investigation. In your comment you said "The use of multiple IP addresses is not prohibited unless the user intends to mislead editors into thinking they are multiple people...I don't see evidence of that intent here". Since you said the editor was not misleading others (like a sock), should they still be blocked for violating the 3RR rule (4 reverts in an hour presented in the sockpuppet investigation)? Elijahandskip (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Elijahandskip: An edit warring block would have potentially been justifiable, although I would point out that the page Battle of Chernobyl is now semi-protected, so it appears that a block might not be necessary anymore to prevent the editor from continuing to edit war. Mz7 (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-14
21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentry
anddeletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.
Tech News: 2022-15
19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-16
23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Cases
This is only being updated intermittently. The last two were 1h40 apart. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: Thanks for the heads up. Taking a look. Mz7 (talk) 01:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: Looks like the root cause is simply that it's a slow day for SPI. Although the bot saves edits every 10 minutes, if no one edits any SPI case page within the last 10 minutes, then the table it saves will be identical to the most recent revision, causing it not to record any new edit in the page history (i.a. a null edit). In this case, since no one has edited SPI since Jack Frost made this edit 1h40m ago, the table has remained unchanged. You can join #wikipedia-en-spi connect to see a feed of recent changes to SPI subpages. Mz7 (talk) 01:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I've noticed that while the case list is being updated normally, the changes aren't being reflected on the main SPI page in a timely manner. Unless I manually purge the page, the list at WP:Sockpuppet investigations remains hours out of date. Not sure what could be causing this - it only started happening a few days ago. Spicy (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 April 2022
- News and notes: Double trouble
- In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia
- Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
- Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March
- Interview: On a war and a map
- Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers
- Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion
- News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?
- Humour: Really huge message boxes
- From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization
Tech News: 2022-17
22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Request
I offer this by way of explanation, not as an excuse. As you alluded to what provoked me: I'm afraid I'm guilty of editing while intoxicated. I think I was annoyed because it seemed that someone had falsified a DS notice when adding it to my page.
As you correctly point out, neither of those, nor any circumstance, would give cause for such comments, of which I'm quite ashamed. If it is within your authority to revdel the edits from public view, without affecting operation of the diffs to those with access, I will be grateful. Cambial — foliar❧ 03:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. I don't think this is severe enough for revision deletion, and with any luck, the edits will hopefully fade into obscurity. Mz7 (talk) 04:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-18
19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Eight years! |
---|
Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-19
15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
- Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
- Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.
- The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
- A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
- Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
Tech News: 2022-20
18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello Mz7,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 818 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-21
00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
Tech News: 2022-22
20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)