Talk page archive |
---|
Splitting
Is there anyway we can split Vulva into two articles properly? One for humans and one for non-humans? I want to see if there is a way to properly do it. Thanks. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 15:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Splits of major articles might be controversial or contentious. The first step is to gain consensus on the talk page. There's detailed instructions at Wikipedia:Splitting. Why do you think this article needs to be split? is the first question you should ask yourself. It's only 6401 words, and almost all of the content is about humans, with only small section at the bottom about other animals. — Diannaa (talk) 15:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I can see your point. Thanks anyway Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyright Barnstar | |
Thank you very much for your tireless work in dealing with the endless stream of copyright issues on Wikipedia! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
Thanks ToBeFree! — Diannaa (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Splitting proposal
Fingering (sexual act) should be split into two articles. One for vulvar/vaginal fingering with its current title and the other for anal fingering with the new title "anal fingering". While fingering is a similar activity whether genitalia or anus, they are different nonetheless, in regards to technique and health risks. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see you've posted on the article talk page, so that's good. You don't need to postabout it here though, since I am not interested in commenting on your proposed split. — Diannaa (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay then. That's good I'm at least doing the right thing! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any way to get other editors attention about this? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is that not covered at Wikipedia:Splitting? See Wikipedia:Splitting#Step 2: Add notice — Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're right! Just did that too. Thanks! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is that not covered at Wikipedia:Splitting? See Wikipedia:Splitting#Step 2: Add notice — Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Creation of page
Can you help me create a Wikipedia page for artist Jesubamise Afolayan (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Artist
please help 🙏🥺if you can send someone to do it for me I'll be very grateful. Can I also have your WhatsApp number incase I want to hear from you.. I'm Afolayan Jesubamise Emmanuel known as Jüstt Mëë, a Nigerian afrobeat singer and songwriter. Jesubamise Afolayan (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
New version of CopyPatrol is now live
Please see meta:Talk:CopyPatrol#New CopyPatrol is live for details. One thing of note is that the number of daily reports has pretty much tripled, so please stop by whenever you get a chance and clear some cases. Thanks! — Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed that too, not sure how sustainable it will be or if some kind of adjustment will be needed (e.g., the number of false positives seems to have gone up, wherein someone just changes one or two words in a paragraph and it flags a match for the remaining text in the paragraph). DanCherek (talk) 22:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Geddy Lee
Morning Diannaa, not sure if the lyric's at the bottom of this section is a copy vio, could you have a look when you're able, much appreciated. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 13:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanx, that's why I was on a fence with that. Thank you for all you do here. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 13:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Cornelius Benedictus has added a lot to this article. Do you use Who wrote that? Anyway, see [1], Some of that is his. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Most of the overlap is a giant quotation from a public domain source. — Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, which is the public source? And are you saying there is no copyvio? Doug Weller talk 07:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- This document is public domain, being from 1883. I don't see any copyvio. — Diannaa (talk) 11:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, which is the public source? And are you saying there is no copyvio? Doug Weller talk 07:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
A recent edit of mine on Jean-Rodolphe Perronet removed by you in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. I can't accress my edits on the article as they are locked somehow.I cannot see the changes I made that triggered this warning, so I am somewhat disadvantaged in responding to your complaint.
I take pride in the number of my contributions to Wikipedia over the past eleven years. I searched my talk page to find my last "Warning". I couldn't find it. I remember somewhere in the past, 2017, 2018?... I got a copyright warning. This "third warning" seems draconian... Risk Engineer (talk) 12:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- The revisions containing the copyright material were hidden from view under under criterion RD1 of the revision deletion policy, and that's why you can't access them any more. There was a paragraph starting "He was responsible for a number of canals, ..." that matches content on page 133 this document. — Diannaa (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Good afternoon and hello Diannaa
- Hello Diannaa, I made a mistake for quoting An AllKPop report regarding Limited quotation and Paraphrasing, sincerely yours, Valenzuela400 (talk) 07:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
Copyright
Can you explain me why you literally removed all of the content for “copyright” ??? Prady1 (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The content you added was a match for material in this document. The photos you uploaded were also present in that paper. Copying someone else's work is a violation of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 00:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Quotes
Hi, I saw that you removed literally all quotes from Ancient North Eurasians, but I am not sure if that is correct. These quotes were used to verify the content. Is the main problem based on the respective copyright of the papers or something else? Because for example this paper is[2] 'Open Access' and "licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source". As such I want to ask for the exact reason. Thanks! Regards – Wikiuser1314 (talk) 08:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) From what I can see, theres both non-free and cc licensed sources where the quotes were taken from (more non-free ones, then cc ones). The quotes for the correctly licensed ones can probably be readded (if Diannaa agrees), but the non-free ones should stay removed. Nobody (talk) 09:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see, thanks. Than I will later reinclude the correctly licensed ones (if Dianna agrees). Regards – Wikiuser1314 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Quotations inside citations are allowed, but this example seemed excessive to me, particularly since your edits seem unlikely to be challenged. I have no objection to adding back the compatibly licensed ones. The remainder will still be there in the page history if you ever need to refer back to them. — Diannaa (talk) 09:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- OK thanks for the clarification! Regards – Wikiuser1314 (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Quotations inside citations are allowed, but this example seemed excessive to me, particularly since your edits seem unlikely to be challenged. I have no objection to adding back the compatibly licensed ones. The remainder will still be there in the page history if you ever need to refer back to them. — Diannaa (talk) 09:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see, thanks. Than I will later reinclude the correctly licensed ones (if Dianna agrees). Regards – Wikiuser1314 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)