Yeah, I'm a bit puzzled about that. There is that depreciated tag at the top but turn to the talk page and you find that the first section is Deprecated (including the strike) and the second is NOT DEPRECATED (all caps). The reason given was WP:AUM but go there and you find "This proposal has been rejected by the community." In section two we read that the problem has been addressed and the template's talk page continues as a normal template talk page would without mention of depreciation. I've also noticed a number of quite recent tranclusions of the template. So is it really depreciated? I don't know. If it is, I suppose I'll go and add to the new version. --Jɪmp 17:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I s'pose I'll leave the depreciated template alone and see what I can do on the new one. --Jɪmp 18:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Colon prefix: thanks
Barek, thanks for your answer on Jimp’s talk page. The colon prefix for image links was something I didn’t know about and was precisely the little trick I’ve long needed. Greg L (my talk) 00:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to help. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the navigation sidebar on our main project page for information about our project guidelines, resources, and pending tasks. You can post any questions at the project talk page. Thank you for joining - we look forward to working with you! Maralia (talk) 23:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]