This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The "Types" section is very messy and difficult to read.
The "Types" section of the document is difficult to read.
Would it be better as tables under subheadings? either as in the existing format of alphabetical order, or by adding additional headings devising them by era or some other metric?
The Proccy (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)