This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Mini-bio extract reproduced on Edward Winter's pages
This may be worth a look, as it gives another image, a precise date of birth of June 15, and maybe a few other details of interest.[1] Regards Brittle heaven (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip. I have now used that source in four places, I think. I also realized that Winter in his books has a little more about Marache, and cited them, too. Krakatoa (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Assessment to B-class
I have raised the quality assessment of this article to B-class because it meets the six B-class criteria:
It is suitably referenced: no problem on that side.
It reasonably covers the topic: I do not see an "Influence" section; that may be problematic for GA-class but not for B-class. Also nothing is said for the period after 1866, but probably he did not do anything of encyclopedic interest ?!
It has a defined structure: sections are clearly defined.
It is reasonably well written: no problem on this side.
It contains supporting material: diagrams and photo, how could I ask for more ?
It is appropriately accessible: the Lead is sufficiently accessible to be read by anyone; the rest of the article is mostly for chess players, but given the subject of the article that is not problematic.
Thanks. The article contains almost everything I could find about the guy. I haven't seen anything about what he did after 1866. He is significant in that he was one of the first chess journalists/writers in the U.S., and one of the first prominent players. I don't think he was strong enough, however, to have a significant influence on other players. I would think that the only players among his contemporaries in the U.S. who did have a significant influence are Paul Morphy (of course) and Louis Paulsen. Then there's Steinitz, but he didn't emigrate to the U.S. until late in life. (Weird fact: the first three world champions all died in the United States, even though none was from here; Lasker and Capablanca even died in the same hospital a year apart.) Krakatoa (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Problem problem?
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Marache, White to play and mate in two
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Marache, position after 1.Bf7!
At left is a chess problem composed by Marache, which he called, "One of the most difficult two-move compositions extant."[1]Edward Winter calls it, "An interesting problem with a Zugzwang theme."[2] The key move is 1.Bf7! (see diagram at right).
So 1. Bf7! f5 How does white mate next move? SunCreator (talk) 14:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same issue with 1...Be4+ SunCreator (talk) 14:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like 2. Qh8 mate (and in case of 1...Be4+ simply Qxe4). --DaQuirin (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
O good grief, Queen on h1, was blind to the queen being there. Thanks DaQuirin. SunCreator (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]