This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This is an informative article article. However, it leaves the reader hanging a number of times.
“a more formal style of attire” - this seems to be designed for those who are already familiar.
”financial history” - nothing is said about the period before the last quarter of the 20th century.
there are large gaps in the history: again, it is recent other than the two disasters of the early 20th century
“capacity”, “LMX”, etc. - no doubt these are familiar to those in the business that those picking up the Encyclopedia to learn are left wanting.
Editors tend to stay in their silos. Would a musician, a biologist, or an architect find sufficient information or links? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 02:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]