This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
I haven't seen Jermaine Lawson on TV, but User:Dingbatdan appears to have overstepped WP:NPOV here.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't understand - is it in reference to his action? Because I was merely stating that he was reported - I am making no judgements Dingbatdan 14:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
No, I mean the phrases "exploded onto the scene", "extraordinary figures" and "superb haul", which are rather suggestive and not particularly neutral.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 05:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
It's undoubted that 6/3 is an extraordinary haul - it is the cheapest 6-for in Test history and unlikely to be replicated. Furthermore, in one's third match (regardless of opposition) it is definately making a mark quickly - hence 'exploded' ie. he became known very quickly as a result. And 'superb haul' references a 7-for against the best team in the world, which is no mean feat.Dingbatdan 04:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I did a bit of a rewrite to try and make it more NPOV. What do people think? -- Deville (Talk) 12:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
No problems here, thanks! Dingbatdan 10:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
NPOV tag
Although marked as December 2007, that's only when the tag was dated; it's been there undated a lot longer. Given the discussion above, does it actually need to stay now? Loganberry (Talk) 14:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)