This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
p.s. - I can’t say I think much of its setting! KJP1 (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@KJP1: Thank you very much! That's another pint I owe you! I promise I don't only love you for your Pevsner collection, though I am envious of it! And no, I don't think the setting is the best. It feels hidden away. I'd have put it on the sea front or further inland by the station so it feels more like a part of the fabric of the town. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, as ever. It’s the siting on the mini-roundabout that I particularly dislike! But I suspect the road layout was different at installation, [1]. KJP1 (talk) 14:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Antram, Nicholas; Morrice, Richard (2008). Brighton and Hove. Pevsner Architectural Guides. London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12661-7.
Brighton Polytechnic. School of Architecture and Interior Design (1987). A Guide to the Buildings of Brighton. Macclesfield: McMillan Martin. ISBN 1-869-86503-0.
Middleton, Judy (2002). The Encyclopaedia of Hove & Portslade. Brighton: Brighton & Hove Libraries.
@Hassocks5489 and KJP1: I'll have a look at what Hassocks sends over from Middleton but I'd appreciate it if you two could cast your eyes over the article and let me know what you think, fix any typos, etc, before I consider taking it to FAC. Much obliged! :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[5] - Quite nice image of the library plaque, but RS?
[6] - Quite interesting on the listing designation
Sure, I’ll give it a once-over. Have added a few more bits above that may be usable. KJP1 (talk) 07:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The first four don't contain a lot of information. The IWM and WMO are linked from the listing. I've had the reliability of WMO questioned at FAC before because most of the information is user-submitted and WWI Yorkshires looks like a hobby site. I've worked in a citation to the Victorian Web piece even though it doesn't say a lot and I've added some bits from the Regency Society, which should pass muster. And some background from the encyclopaedia which Hassocks provided. Thanks! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]