This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles
the UN says Georgia is part of Western Asia. Besides, transcontinental location is actually mentioned in the article, so I don't see how it is biased.Keverich1 (talk) 13:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First. It appears unfair, if not dishonest, that all comments on the article since October 2008 have been deleted. no archive either.
Second, on the subject. The article is about geography. By all geography textbooks Georgia is 100% in Asia. If you wich to give an overview of current politics around 'European' boundaries, please start a separate article. For example if one looks well at the link to EU wibsite, tehn it can be found that Georgia is 'inside' Europe as surrounded by Turkey, Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, which are also mentioned as 'European' for some unknown political reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.163.107.100 (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note that WP itself has
The modern definition of Europe delimits it from Asia at the Aegean Sea, the Dardanelles-Sea of Marmora-Bosporus, the Black Sea, along the watershed of the Greater Caucasus, the northwestern portion of the Caspian Sea and along the Ural Mountains, as both mapped and listed in many atlases including that of the National Geographic Society and as described in the World Factbook. According to this definition, Georgia and Azerbaijan both have most of their territory in Asia, although each has small parts of their northern borderlands north of the Greater Caucasus watershed and thus in Europe.
—DIV (138.194.11.244 (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Unacceptable Politicising
This article renders the following info: "Redirected from Geography of South Ossetia]" which is listed as a subject on [[1]] under [[2]]
This is totally unacceptable. We know what South Ossetia is -- a territory with roughly the same status as Taiwan, Kosovo, Plaestine etc. and in the case of these other ones, GEOGRAPHY article on Wikipedia is NOT being re-directed to the geography of states these states with limited recognition previously belonged/belong nominally but not factually. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.66.64 (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]