This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Created by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 01:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]
The article is long and new enough. The hook is interesting and supported by a reliable source. No copyvio was observed. But I am not happy with Refs 8 and 9. Per WP:SCHOLARSHIP: "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence." Can you enhance the sourcing please? --Mhhosseintalk 12:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: I replaced the thesis with a different journal and added another one that I also came across. - Aoidh (talk) 14:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
alright @Aoidh:, But wait; I don't want to be too meticulous, but when we say "studies" show sth, we need to cite more than one study concluding the same thing or alter the hook so that it does not convey an inaccurate meaning. Let me know your choice. --Mhhosseintalk 14:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: I reworded it so that it showed the exact number of studies being referenced. - Aoidh (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go with the proposed hook. --Mhhosseintalk 14:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]