This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Power in international relations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Power in international relationsWikipedia:WikiProject Power in international relationsTemplate:WikiProject Power in international relationsPower in international relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
A footnote cites "Reynolds 1994" as a reference but the book is missing from the bibliography.--Britannicus (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Habsburg
Taken from the article: "In the 16th and 17th centuries, English foreign policy strove to prevent a creation of a single universal monarchy in Europe, which many believed France or Spain might attempt to create."
The same could strictly speaking also be said about Austria, since the Habsburgs long controlled both Austria and Spain, including territories like the Netherlands and Burgundy. Charles V was the person closest to the creation of such a single universal monarchy --Vitzque (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The reign of Charles V could be noted. Argovian (talk) 06:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Off topic
Hi! I think the article needs a cleanup and some sorting. The historical section is not relevant, as the subject deals with the politics of the early modern era and beyond. All the best Wikirictor 11:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]