This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted from this draft on 12 March 2019 by reviewer Legacypac (talk· contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
POV
Surely we can find more sources criticising the concept than a single source, especially for what's definitely a heterodox view of economics. Eldomtom2 (talk) 15:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Surely we can find someone so lazy as to criticize the presentation who has a literate response with examples! 98.215.221.56 (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there are such sources then present them. KetchupSalt (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Of course these criticise it from different angles (some from the left, some from the right), and for different reasons, and a lot of these are primary sources. But I think my point that there is a great deal of opposition to the concept, which the article should reflect, is made.--Eldomtom2 (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]