This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Classification
Does anyone know anything about the history of this road? Then the stub could be removed.--Rschen7754 19:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Well, you're an idiot and should have looked at the state law. --Rschen7754 06:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 247/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- You should indicate that the portion of SR 247 between SR 62 and Lucerne Valley runs through deserts (you do further along in the route description).
- " In 2001, Caltrans indicated that most of the highway was considered "maintain only" until 2020", what is "maintain only" supposed to mean? Should clarify here.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
A couple small issues to be addressed, but otherwise good. Will put on hold. Dough4872 01:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)