This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Controversy" -- not sufficiently notable
I question the notability of this. The decision was later reversed, and the kid got his certificate. This is certainly not one of the top 50 controversies involving the AOC in the history of the office. I will delete it if there is not serious objection. Thesmothete 05:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah... although you've already removed. It was just a minor blip on the radar. It was somewhat notable (in that it received some news coverage), but probably not enough. We don't need to document every little tiny "controversy" in every article. Mahalo. --Ali'i 21:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Extended content
|
---|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to one external link on Architect of the Capitol. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
Agency or person?
...or one-man agency, if that's a thing? DAVilla (talk) 00:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)