→Please help!: entire talk page! |
Renamed user U1krw4txwPvuEp3lqV382vOcqa7 (talk | contribs) →Please help!: Replying to El C (using reply-link) |
||
Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
{{U|Vanamonde93}}, Please read [https://winkreport.com/wikipedia-article-on-delhi-riots-refuses-to-include-violence-by-muslims/ this]. Can you add matter about the violence by Muslims in the [[North East Delhi riots]] article '''please'''? For example, [[Special:MobileDiff/942879250| this]]. DBigXray, S. M. Nazmus Shakib and some other editors are not allowing us to do so, the talk page has many citable references which you can see yourself!—[[User:Spasiba5|Spasiba5]] ([[User talk:Spasiba5|talk]]) 17:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
{{U|Vanamonde93}}, Please read [https://winkreport.com/wikipedia-article-on-delhi-riots-refuses-to-include-violence-by-muslims/ this]. Can you add matter about the violence by Muslims in the [[North East Delhi riots]] article '''please'''? For example, [[Special:MobileDiff/942879250| this]]. DBigXray, S. M. Nazmus Shakib and some other editors are not allowing us to do so, the talk page has many citable references which you can see yourself!—[[User:Spasiba5|Spasiba5]] ([[User talk:Spasiba5|talk]]) 17:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, just try to deduce those citations by looking at the... ''entire talk page.'' Don't forget the archives! [[User:El_C|El_C]] 21:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
:Yes, just try to deduce those citations by looking at the... ''entire talk page.'' Don't forget the archives! [[User:El_C|El_C]] 21:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
::... and the '''talk page history''' for the citations that were removed along with BLP violating comments. ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|⋙–D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 21:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:24, 29 February 2020
Happy New Year Vanamonde93!
Possible vandalism
These are some long term vandalism from Pahlevun on People's Mujahedin of Iran's political leaders Massoud Rajavi and Maryam Rajavi.
Massoud Rajavi
- Change infobox from "Officeholder" to "Criminal" [diff]
- Change infobox from "Officeholder" to "Criminal" [diff]
- Change infobox from "Officeholder" to "Person" [diff] (Massoud Rajavi is a political leader of a political group).
- Add information about the partners of Massoud Rajavi's wives saying they're related to Rajavi, even though the partners of his partners are not related to Rajavi.[diff diff]
- Adds information about a "prosecution" from a source that doesn't even mention Massoud Rajavi. [diff]
- Removes [Category:People's Mujahedin of Iran politicians] [diff]
- Removes [Category:People's Mujahedin of Iran politicians] [diff]
- Removes [Category:People's Mujahedin of Iran politicians] [diff]
- Removes [Category:People's Mujahedin of Iran politicians] [diff]
- Removes [Category:National Council of Resistance of Iran members] [diff]
Maryam Rajavi
- Change infobox from "President" to "Criminal" [diff]
- Change infobox from "President" to "Person" [diff]
- Removes [Category:People's Mujahedin of Iran politicians] [diff]
- Removes [Category:People's Mujahedin of Iran politicians] [diff]
I tried reverting some of these edits, but he has reverted them back. Barca (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Vanamonde? can you check this please? Barca (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- @BarcrMac: Sorry for not replying sooner. These edits are not vandalism. Do not refer to them as such. The definition of vandalism on Wikipedia is very precise; vandalism is activity that is deliberately intended to disrupt the purpose of the encyclopedia. These edits are very obviously made in good faith. All of the labels in question are in fact disputed, and should be determined via consensus on the talk page; certainly, for contentious individuals, "infobox person" is the best choice. I see a glaring absence of talk page discussion on the subject; please take your disagreements there. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Emilia Clarke review
Hi Vanamonde, hope you are well. I saw that you reviewed the first GAN for Emilia Clarke. I have been working on the article, especially addressing your remarks about the possible copyright violation along with the short prose. I was wondering if you could take a look to see if there are any glaring issues that would need to be addressed before another possible GAN. Thank you! -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- @LuK3: I'm afraid I'm far too busy in RL to take that sort of thing on at the moment, sorry. I seem to recall that the issues I raised were very basic, so I don't know that my opinion on the new version would be more informed than that of another reviewer in any case. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
MEK
I was very surprised that the ping was not sent, it's not normal really! Anyway, I wonder if you check this discussion and recent edits to of MEK article. Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 06:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- It seems that my pings didn't work. Would you leave a comment for this disscusion (first part absolutely)? Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to remind you to let me know your opinion about this discussion top of "Ypatch's violation of the restriction" section. Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 07:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- It seems that my pings didn't work. Would you leave a comment for this disscusion (first part absolutely)? Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for picking up the slack, Vanamonde, while I take a break from the vortex that is the MEK article. El_C 20:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- @El C: You're welcome, but don't get too comfortable, I don't have much time on my hands these days ;) Vanamonde (Talk) 20:57, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Scheduling the edits
It looks like the 2001 film section on your Talk page has gone to archive from early January. Any thoughts about returning to the article upgrades for featured article improvements maybe later this month or next month? CodexJustin (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- @CodexJustin: I hate to do this, but I really cannot commit. Real life has gotten very very busy, and I've been unable to devote any substantive time to Wikipedia; and content building genuinely requires substantive time, not the few minutes I can spare now and then. I don't want to hold you up. If the article still needs attention when I do find the time, I'll see what I can do. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report
Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report
Our 2019 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators:
Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC) |
Please watch Golla (caste)
an editor called Koudilya3 is removing my article with proper reference in Golla (caste) page so please check the page brother. and take necessary action on it ,please please, please, please, please . Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've left a comment on that talk page; essentially, you need to be more careful with respect to the sources you are using. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Mail call
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Bishonen | talk 16:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: replied. Sorry, been dealing with this crap. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Brother check Golla (caste) talk page
Bro, I submitted quote with reference as you asked please see it brother and check on it Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 18:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Golla page
Brother, Directorate of Archaeology and Museums, Mysore is not his job it is the Government Department who Published this book Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
One Doubt
Brother I dont know how to explain you about Yadava (golla). so can i add krishnadevaraya to the page Yadava directly. Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
An arbitration case regarding User:Alex Shih has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion last year to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Alex Shih requested it within one year. Because Alex Shih has not requested the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Alex Shih#Motion to Suspend.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 19:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Mahavira
Mahavira, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. A. Parrot (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 4, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 4, 2020.—Wehwalt (talk) 08:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Wehwalt, I'll try to take a look when I have a moment. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert Hunter (lyricist)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Hunter (lyricist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Moisejp -- Moisejp (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Please help!
Vanamonde93, Please read this. Can you add matter about the violence by Muslims in the North East Delhi riots article please? For example, this. DBigXray, S. M. Nazmus Shakib and some other editors are not allowing us to do so, the talk page has many citable references which you can see yourself!—Spasiba5 (talk) 17:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)