Content deleted Content added
←New page: 'While I appreciate Abu badali's campaign to erase my contributions from Wikipedia, due to disputes over fair use policy, I think it's unreasonable to st...' |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 22:17, 26 November 2006
While I appreciate Abu badali's campaign to erase my contributions from Wikipedia, due to disputes over fair use policy, I think it's unreasonable to start randomly tagging pages that have no dog in that fight for deletion, simply because they were created/edited by a particular editor. Very, very childish, and not-Wikipedia like. Someone needs to justify why THIS article is a candidate for speedy deletion, if you ask me. Which policy does it violate? None. It's maybe a stub, but the last time I checked, "being a stub" does NOT automatically make an article a candidate for deletion. Jenolen 22:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)