67.180.10.217 (talk) |
67.180.10.217 (talk) |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2005-0168, Alfred Rosenberg.jpg|thumb|left|175px|[[Alfred Rosenberg]]]] |
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2005-0168, Alfred Rosenberg.jpg|thumb|left|175px|[[Alfred Rosenberg]]]] |
||
==='' |
===''Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg'' (ERR)=== |
||
The ''Sonderauftrag Linz'' was not the only Nazi agency collecting art works. In France, as in [[Reichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce|many other countries in Europe]], the office of ''[[Reichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce| |
The ''Sonderauftrag Linz'' was not the only Nazi agency collecting art works. In France, as in [[Reichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce|many other countries in Europe]], the office of ''[[Reichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce|Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg]]'' (Special Purposes Reich Leader Rosenberg) was the primary agency.<ref name=plaut /> On 5 November 1940, a directive from ''Reichsmarchall'' [[Hermann Göring]] to [[Alfred Rosenberg]], the head of the ERR, and to the Chief of Military Administration in Paris outlines the several categories of "ownerless" art confiscated from Jews for "safeguarding". One of the categories were "Those art objects for the further disposition of which the Führer has reserved for himself the right of decision," while other categories were those works desired by Göring himself, those destined for German museums other than the ''Führermuseum''. Although the directive was intended to be effective immediately, Göring indicates that he had yet to clear it with Hitler, but intended to do so.<ref>Edsel with Witter (2009), p.31</ref> |
||
Hitler then issued on 18 November his own directive, a ''Führerbefehl'' similar to the ones he had issued for Poland and Austria, announcing his prerogative over all confiscated art in the occupied Western territories. Rosenberg thus became a formal procurement agent for the ''Führermuseum'', except when Göring intervened. This apparently brought about some internecine squabbling, as Dr. Posse had been given the authority to act on Hitler's behalf, and the German commanders of occupied countries were required to keel him regularly informed about their confiscations of artwork. Probably because of Göring's interference, Posse formally requested that the Reich Chancellery to reiterate his power to act for the ''Führer''. The result was a "general high-level directive" confirming Hitler's primacy through Posse, and a direction to Posse to review the ERR's inventory in regard to the needs of the planned museum in Linz.<ref name=plaut /> |
Hitler then issued on 18 November his own directive, a ''Führerbefehl'' similar to the ones he had issued for Poland and Austria, announcing his prerogative over all confiscated art in the occupied Western territories. Rosenberg thus became a formal procurement agent for the ''Führermuseum'', except when Göring intervened. This apparently brought about some internecine squabbling, as Dr. Posse had been given the authority to act on Hitler's behalf, and the German commanders of occupied countries were required to keel him regularly informed about their confiscations of artwork. Probably because of Göring's interference, Posse formally requested that the Reich Chancellery to reiterate his power to act for the ''Führer''. The result was a "general high-level directive" confirming Hitler's primacy through Posse, and a direction to Posse to review the ERR's inventory in regard to the needs of the planned museum in Linz.<ref name=plaut /> |
||
On 20 March 1941, Rosenberg reported that his unit had proceeded to follow the directive, having "collected" over 4000 items; those personally selected by Göring had already been shipped by train to the air-raid shelters of the |
On 20 March 1941, Rosenberg reported that his unit had proceeded to follow the directive, having "collected" over 4000 items; those personally selected by Göring had already been shipped by train to the air-raid shelters of the Führer Building in Munich.<ref>Edsel with Witter (2009), pp.42-43</ref> Several years later, on 16 April 1943, Rosenberg sent Hitler photographs of some of the more valuable paintings confiscated from the Western Occupied Territories, to add to the 53 photographs he had sent earlier. Rosenberg asked for permission to see Hitler personally, to present a catalog of works seized, as well as 20 additional folders of photographs.<ref>Edsel with Witter (2009), p.49</ref> These "Führer albums", which were created between autumn 1940 and autumn 1944, were presented to Hitler every Christmas and on his birthday, 20 April. Originally thirty-one volumes existed, but only nineteen have been preserved in Germany, and 11 are considered to be lost.<ref name=history /> The album are documents of the intended gallery holdings and are the most important historical and visual sources relating to the gallery of the ''Führermuseum''.<ref>Schwarz, Birgit. "Hitlers Museum". Die Fotoalben Gemäldegalerie Linz. Wien, Böhlau Verlag, 2004. ISBN 3-205-77054-4</ref><ref>Schwarz, Birgit. "Hitler's Museum", in: ''Vitalizing Memory''. International Perspectives on Provenance Research, Washington 2005, S. pp.51-54</ref> |
||
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1979-089-22, Hermann Göring crop.jpg|thumb|right|177px|Hermann Göring in 1942]] |
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1979-089-22, Hermann Göring crop.jpg|thumb|right|177px|Hermann Göring in 1942]] |
Revision as of 06:14, 12 March 2015
48°17′25″N 14°17′31″E / 48.290139°N 14.291981°E
The Führermuseum (English, Leader's Museum) was an unrealized museum within a cultural complex planned by Adolf Hitler for the Austrian city of Linz, Hitler's hometown. Its purpose was to display the collection of art plundered or stolen by the Nazis from throughout Europe during World War II. The cultural district was to be part of an overall plan to revitalize Linz, and turn it into Austria's capital, overshadowing Vienna, for which Hitler had a personal distaste.
The expected completion date for the project was 1950, but neither the Führermuseum nor the cultural center it was to be the anchor of were ever built. The only part of the elaborate plan which was constructed was the Nibelungen Bridge, which is still extant.[1]
Design
The idea and overall design concept for a new cultural district in Linz anchored by the Führermuseum was Adolf Hitler's own. He intended Linz to be the future cultural capital of the Reich, and the political capital of Austria, overshadowing Vienna, a city in which he had spent some years as a struggling artist,[2] and about which he felt considerable distaste, not only because of the Jewish influence on the city, but because of his own failure to gain admission to the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts.
[Hitler] invisaged Linz as the future seat of the new German Kultur, and lavished all his limited pictorial talent and architectural training on a vast project which would realize this ambition. ... [He] devoted a disproportionate amount of time and energy, for a chief of state, to the plans for Linz, personally creating the architectural scheme for an imposing array of public buildings, and setting the formula for an art collection which was to specialize heavily in his beloved, mawkish German school of the nineteenth century. His private library, discovered by the American Army deep in Austria, contained scores of completed architectural renderings for the Linz project...[2]
In Autumn 1940, Hitler commissioned architect Hermann Geisler to draw up plans for the rebuilding of Linz,[3] based on his own designs. These included a monumental theatre, a library with over 250,000 volumes, an opera house, a collection of armor and an Adolf Hitler Hotel, all surrounded by huge boulevards and a parade ground.[4][2] Located south of the historic section of Linz, the main buildings, including the Führermuseum, were to be aligned along one main avenue, which after the war was called "a typical National Socialist axis street."[1]
The museum itself, which was designed by Roderich Frick based on Hitler's sketches and specifications, was to be modeled after the Haus der Deutschen Kunst in Munich, and would feature a colonnaded facade about 500 feet (150 meters) long. It would stand on the site of the Linz railroad station, which was to be moved four kilometers to the south.[5][2] Should the volume of German art bought, confiscated and plundered for the museum be such that expansion was needed, an additional building could easily be integrated into the planned district.[2]
By January 1945, Hitler became obsessed with seeing a model of the planned cultural complex; he had his adjutants and Martin Bormann call Geisler's office repeatedly, to ask when the Führer could view the model. Geisler's office worked around the clock to finish it. The model was finally set up in the cellar of the New Reich Chancellary, and was ready for viewing on 9 February.[3] Hitler was apparently entranced by what he saw:
Bent over the model, he viewed it from all angles, and in different kinds of lighting. He asked for a seat. He checked the proportions of the different buildings. He asked about the details of the bridges. He studied the model for a long time, apparently lost in thought. While Geisler stayed in Berlin, Hitler accompanied him twice daily to view the model, in the afternoon and again during the night. Others in his entourage were taken down to have his building plans explained to them as they pored over the model. Looking down on the model of a city which, he knew, would never be built, Hitler could fall in reverie, revisiting the fantasies of his youth, when he would dream with his friend Kubizek about rebuilding Linz.[3]
Near the end of the war, when American forces overran Hitler's private library, which was hidden deep in Austria, it contained "scores" of plans and renderings for the museum and the complex as a whole. They also found The Future Economic Status of the City of Linz a 78=page bound volume prepared for Hitler by the Economic and Research Section of the Oberdonau Department of the Interior, which outlined how the revitalization of would take place. The planned museum and cultural district were part of this overall plan. The entire Linz project was treated as a state secret on Hitler's order.[2]
Collection
Sonderauftrag Linz
In the first weeks after the Anschluss in March 1938, which united Austria with the German Reich, both the Gestapo and the Nazi Party confiscated numerous artworks for themselves. In response, on 18 June 1938, Hitler issued a decree placing all artwork that had been seized in Austria under the personal prerogative of the Fuhrer:
As part of the seizure of assets hostile to the state– especially Jewish assets – in Austria, paintings and other artwork of great value, among other things, have been confiscated. The Führer requests that this artwork, for the most part from Jewish hands, be neither used as furnishings of administration offices or senior bureaucrats’ official residences nor purchased by leading state and party leaders. The Führer plans to personally decide on the use of the property after its seizure. He is considering putting artwork first and foremost at the disposal of small Austrian towns for their collections.[6]
The intent of the order was to guarantee that Hitler would have first choice of the plundered art, both for his own personal collection, and for his planned Führermuseum.[1]
On 21 June 1939, Hitler set up the Sonderauftrag Linz (Special Commission: Linz) in Dresden and appointed Dr. Hans Posse, director of the Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister ("Dresden Picture Gallery"), as special envoy. A few days later, on 26 June, Hitler signed a letter intended to give Posse the authority he would need to do this job. He wrote:
I commission Dr. Hans Posse, Director of Dresden Gallery, to build up the new art museum for Linz Donau. All Party and State services are ordered to assist Dr. Posse in fulfillment of his mission.[7]
Posse's appointment came despite his having been previously removed as director, a position he had held since 1912, for supposedly harboring anti-Nazi beliefs. He was later restored to the post.[2] Although Hitler had favored German and Austrian paintings from the 19th century, Posse's focus was on early German, Dutch, French, and Italian paintings.[8]
The Sonderauftrag not only collected art for the Führermuseum, but also for other museums in the German Reich, especially in the eastern territories. The artworks would have been distributed to these museums after the war. The Sonderauftrag was located in Dresden had approximately 20 specialists attached to it: "curators of paintings, prints, coins, and armor, a librarian, an architect, an administrator, photographers, and restorers."[2] The staff included Robert Oertel and Gottfried Reimer of the Dresden Gallery,
In the late summer and autumn of 1939, Posse traveled a number of times to Vienna to the Central Depot for confiscated art in the Neue Burg to pick out art pieces for the Linz museum,[1] and in October he gave to Martin Bormann, for Hitler's approval, the list of artworks confiscated from the Vienna Rothschilds which Posse had selected for the museum. These 182 pieces were also included in Posse's July 1940 list of 324 paintings he had chosen for the museum's collection.[2] Posse also went to Poland to examine confiscated artworks there, selecting works by Leonardo, Raphael, and Rembrandt for the museum in Linz, although these pieces never actually left the control of the General Government, the rump of Poland left after Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union took the territory they wanted.[2]
On 10 June 1940, Posse wrote to Bormann:
The special delegate for the safeguarding of art and cultural properties has just returned from Holland. He notified me today that there exists at the moment a particularly favorable opportunity to purchase valuable works of art from Dutch dealers and private owners in German currency. Even though a large number of important works have doubtless been removed recently from Holland, I believe that the trade still contains many objects which are desirable for the Fürher's collection, and which may be acquired without foreign exchange.[2]
As a result of this, accounts of about 500,000 reichsmarks were opened in Paris and Rome for Posse's personal use, and, around July 1940, he expanded the scope of the Sonderauftrag Linz into Belgium and Holland when he established an office in The Hague as Referent für Sonderfragen (Adviser on "Special Questions"). Posse was able to report to Bormann that as of March 1941 he had spent 8,522,348 reichsmarks on artworks for the Führermuseum. He later bought most of the Mannheimer Collection in 1944, including Rembrandt's Jewish Doctor – assisted by the threat of confiscation from the collaborationist government of Arthur Seyss-Inquart – with the remainder of the collection being purchased in the same manner in France later on. [2] The collecting of the Sonderauftrag Linz includes many such cases of forced sale, using funds from sales of Hitler's book Mein Kampf and stamps showing his portrait. Members of the Sonderauftrag Linz made a considerable number of purchasing trips throughout Europe, acquiring a significant number of artworks, and also arranged purchases through art dealers.[1][9][10]
Posse died in December 1942 of cancer. His funeral was a high state function, with Gŏring delivering the eulogy. Posse had gathered more than 2500 art works for the Linz museum in the three years he was head of the Sonderauftrag Linz. Notably, these include three Rembrandts, La Danse by Watteau, the Memling portrait by Corsini, the Rubens Ganymede, and Vermeer;s The Artist in His Studio, a forced sale at a knock-down price.[2]
In March 1943, Hermann Voss, an art historian, director of the Wiesbaden Gallery and former deputy director of the Kaiser Friedrich Museum in Berlin[1] took over the Special Commission.[11] Voss, whose focus was on French and Italian paintings,[8] was not nearly as active or energetic as Posse had been, but under interrogation after the war he claimed to have acquired 3000 painting for the Führermuseum between 1943 and 1944, although the records do not support this figure, and many of the artworks were of distinctly secondary importance.[2]
Count Wolff-Metternich and Jacques Jaujard
The German occupation of Paris began on 14 June 1940, and on 30 June Hitler ordered that artworks in the French national collection be "safeguarded", and in particular "ownerless" art and historical documents – meaning works which were the property of Jews and could therefore be confiscated from them – be "protected" as well. Three days later, the German ambassador in France, Otto Abetz, ordered the confiscation of the collections of the 15 most important art dealers in the city, most of whom were Jewish. These pieces were then brought to the German Embassy. Through the actions of Count Franz von Wolff-Metternich, the head of the Kunstschutz (Art Protection) – an agency which dated from World War I and which had a mission which was superficially similar to that of the Allied Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives program (MFAA) – Nazi military authorities intervened and stopped Abetz from making any more confiscations. Most of the artwork in the Embassy was then transferred for storage to the Louvre, at the suggestion of Jacques Jaujard, the Director of French National Museums.[12]
Wolff-Metternich continued in his efforts to protect the artworks, which what he saw as the proper role of his agency. In particular, he was able to fend off Joseph Goebbels' demand that almost a thousand pieces of "Germanic" art held in the collection of confiscated pieces be shipped immediately to Germany. Wolff-Metternich did not disagree that the artworks properly belonged in the Reich, but did not think that sending them at the time was the correct course of action, and held off Goebbels with bureaucratic maneuvres and s strict interpretation of Hitler's directive, which specified that artwork in France should not be moved until a peace treaty between France and German had been signed, which had not as yet occurred.[12]
The collection of artwork in the Louvre was destined to survive the war, and was not subjected to predation from the various Nazi entities confiscating and collecting artwork for shipment back to Germany, including those doing so for Hitler's planned museum in Linz. Wolff-Metternich was eventually removed from his office, as he was not pliable enough to provide the veneer of legality that was wanted by the Nazi authorities. Jaujard was fired as well after his vehement protest over the German theft of the Ghent Altarpiece in 1942, but when the staffs of every French museum resigned in protest over his dismissal, the Nazis were forced to restore him to his office, where he was able to continue to safeguard the French national collection, and provide assistance to the Resistance.[12]
Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg (ERR)
The Sonderauftrag Linz was not the only Nazi agency collecting art works. In France, as in many other countries in Europe, the office of Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg (Special Purposes Reich Leader Rosenberg) was the primary agency.[2] On 5 November 1940, a directive from Reichsmarchall Hermann Göring to Alfred Rosenberg, the head of the ERR, and to the Chief of Military Administration in Paris outlines the several categories of "ownerless" art confiscated from Jews for "safeguarding". One of the categories were "Those art objects for the further disposition of which the Führer has reserved for himself the right of decision," while other categories were those works desired by Göring himself, those destined for German museums other than the Führermuseum. Although the directive was intended to be effective immediately, Göring indicates that he had yet to clear it with Hitler, but intended to do so.[13]
Hitler then issued on 18 November his own directive, a Führerbefehl similar to the ones he had issued for Poland and Austria, announcing his prerogative over all confiscated art in the occupied Western territories. Rosenberg thus became a formal procurement agent for the Führermuseum, except when Göring intervened. This apparently brought about some internecine squabbling, as Dr. Posse had been given the authority to act on Hitler's behalf, and the German commanders of occupied countries were required to keel him regularly informed about their confiscations of artwork. Probably because of Göring's interference, Posse formally requested that the Reich Chancellery to reiterate his power to act for the Führer. The result was a "general high-level directive" confirming Hitler's primacy through Posse, and a direction to Posse to review the ERR's inventory in regard to the needs of the planned museum in Linz.[2]
On 20 March 1941, Rosenberg reported that his unit had proceeded to follow the directive, having "collected" over 4000 items; those personally selected by Göring had already been shipped by train to the air-raid shelters of the Führer Building in Munich.[14] Several years later, on 16 April 1943, Rosenberg sent Hitler photographs of some of the more valuable paintings confiscated from the Western Occupied Territories, to add to the 53 photographs he had sent earlier. Rosenberg asked for permission to see Hitler personally, to present a catalog of works seized, as well as 20 additional folders of photographs.[15] These "Führer albums", which were created between autumn 1940 and autumn 1944, were presented to Hitler every Christmas and on his birthday, 20 April. Originally thirty-one volumes existed, but only nineteen have been preserved in Germany, and 11 are considered to be lost.[8] The album are documents of the intended gallery holdings and are the most important historical and visual sources relating to the gallery of the Führermuseum.[16][17]
Over 20,000 objects were confiscated from France. Of these, about 700 went to Göring, and the rest were earmarked for the Führermuseum in Linz.[2] In 2008, the German Historic Museum of Berlin published a database[18] with paintings collected for the Führermuseum and for other museums in the German Reich.
Hermann Göring
Göring was an avid collector of confiscated artworks, and on occasion his desires conflicted with those of Hitler and Hitler's agents. When this occurred, Göring gave way, not wanting to provoke trouble with the Führer. Several times, he also made "gifts" to the collection of the Führermuseum. He sent 53 pieces from the French Rothschild Collection, which had been acquired in Paris for him by the ERR, to Munich to be held for the Linz museum, and in 1945 gave 17 paintings and 4 bronzes from the Naples Museum. These had been confiscated by the Hermann Göring Panzer Division while they were being shipped to safety from Monte Cassino to the Vatican, and were later presented to the Reichsmarschall.[2]
Confiscated or bought?
There is some debate about whether art for the Führermuseum was primarily stolen or purchased. Hanns Christian Löhr argues in Das Braune Haus der Kunst: Hitler und der "Sonderauftrag Linz" ("The Brown House of Art and the 'Sonderauftrag Linz'") that only a small portion of the collection – possibly 12 percent – came from seizures or expropriation. Moreover, another 2.5% was derived from forced sales.[19] However, Jonathan Petropoulos, a historian at Loyola College in Baltimore and an expert in wartime looting, argues that most of the purchases were not arms' length in nature.[20] Gerard Aalders, a Dutch historian, said those sales amounted to "technical looting," since the Netherlands and other occupied countries were forced to accept German reichsmarks that ultimately proved worthless. Aalders argues that "If Hitler's or Goering's art agent stood on your doorstep and offered $10,000 for the painting instead of the $100,000 it was really worth, it was pretty hard to refuse." He adds that Nazis who encountered reluctant sellers threatened to confiscate the art or arrest the owner.[20] Birgit Schwarz, an expert on the Führermuseum, in her review of Löhr's book, pointed out that the author focused on the purchases in the Führerbau in Munich and ignored the deposits of looted art in Upper Austria in Thürntal, Kremsmünster and Hohenfurt/Vyssi Brod.[21]
On the subject of purchases versus confiscations, Dr. Cris Whetton, the author of Hitler's Fortune[22] commented:
I had expected to find that [Hitler] was directly responsible for looting and stealing of paintings that he wanted for himself, and I couldn't find any evidence of it, I found evidence that he paid for them; sometimes at knock-down prices, but not direct theft in any way. I was quite surpised by this, and I have to say in all honesty that's what I found.[23]
The Dutch Advisory Committee on the Assessment of Restitution Applications for Items of Cultural Value and the Second World War assesses sales by Dutch Jews to the Sonderauftrag Linz. At least two restitution claims were rejected because the Committee argued that there were not enough indications showing coercion as the cause of the sale. For example in 2009 the Restitution Committee rejected the application for the restitution of 12 works sold by the Jewish art dealer Kurt Walter Bachstitz to the Sonderauftrag Linz between 1940 and 1941. The Committee argued that Bachstitz had been "undisturbed" in the first years of the occupation nand said it had not found signs of coercion.[24] In 2012 the Commission rejected a claim of the heirs of Benjamin and Nathan Katz, former Jewish art dealers in the Netherlands. The claim related inter alia to 64 works that the art dealership Katz sold to the Sonderauftrag Linz. The Commission came to the conclusion that there were not enough indications demonstrating that the sales were made under duress.[25]
Legal authority
The legal authority for the collection of artworks for the Führermuseum began with Hitler himself, who, after the Enabling Act of 1933, had the power to enact laws without involving the Reichstag. In effect, whatever Hitler directed to be done had the force of law. It was his personal desire for the creation of a museum and the revitalization of Linz which began the collection program. Martin Bormann, the head of the Nazi Party and later also Hitler's private secretary, was also closely connected to the program from the beginning, in particular as a conduit through which to access Hitler.[2]
On the next level of hierarchy, Reichsminister Hans Lammers, who was President of the Reich Chancellery, and Dr. Helmut von Hummel, Bormann's Special Assistant and "a particularly viscious Nazi", actually drew up the directives which set out the policies and procedures which governed the collecting process, both for confiscations and purchases. The financing and administration of the Linz program was their responsibility.[2]
Other Nazi officials involved in the confiscation of art, but not specifically with collection for the Linz museum, included the Reich Minister for Science, Education, and Culture, Bernhard Rust; the Governor General for Poland, Hans Frank; and Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS.[8]
Dealers and agents
A number of art dealers and private individuals profited greatly from Hitler's campaign to stock his planned museum. Primary among them was Karl Haberstock, who operated a wide network of German agents in Paris, the south of France, Holland and Switzerland, but also at least 75 French collaborators. Haberstock declined to take a commission on the major purchases for the museum, but took his regular fee otherwise, amassing a fortune.[2]
Maria Dietrich was another art dealer who did well by the Nazi obsession with obtaining art. An acquaintance of Hitler through his official photographer, Heinrich Hoffmann, Dietrich sold 80 paintings to the Linz museum collection, and a further 270 for Hitler's personal collection, as well as over 300 for other German museums and Nazi Party functionaries. Prolific rather than knowledgeable, Dietrich still managed to make a considerable amount of money from the Linz program.[2]
Unlike Dietrich, Sturmabteilung Gruppenführer Prince Philipp of Hessenl was a connoisseur of the arts and architecture and acted as Posse's principal agent in Italy, where he lived with his wife, a daughter of King Victor Emmanuel. A grandson of Frederick III, German Emperor, and a great-grandson of Queen Victoria, Philipp provided " a veneer of aristocratic elegance which facilitated important purchases from the Italian nobility."[2]
Other Nazi agents in the Linz program included Kajetan Mühlmann, a high SS official whose territories were Poland and the Netherlands; Baron Kurt von Behr of the ERR in France; and Hitler's photographer Heinrich Hoffmann, an early art adviser who fall from Hitler's favor after 1941, due to Martin Bormann's dislike of him, but who had acted as an intermediary between some German art dealers and the Linz program, and possibly did the same in Holland as well.[2]
Hitler's will
By the time of Hitler's suicide, he has amassed 8,500 artworks which he intended for the Führermuseum.[26] In the "Private Testament" he drew up days before his death, he specified that the collection should go to the museum when it was built, writing that they were "never collected for private purposes but only for the development of a Gallery in my hometown of Linz."[27][28]
Storage and recovery
The artworks collected for the Führermuseum were stored in a number of places. The purchases were mostly kept in the air raid shelters of the Führerbau in Munich – one of a number of large buildings Hitler had built in the birthplace of the Nazi Party – where they were under the control of the Nazi Party Chancellery, while confiscated artworks were stored in deposits in the area of Upper Austria, located in the middle of forests or in the mountains. The ERR alone requisitioned six estates for storage, including Neuschwanstein Castle in the Bavarian Alps, in which items from France were stored; the Benedictine monastery on the island of Frauenchiemsee in the Chiemsee lake, halfway between Munich and Salzburg; an estate in the Salzkammergut hills, which had been a summer residence for the Austrian royal family; and the Grand Duke of Luxembourg's hunting lodge.[2][8]
Despite the fact that these locations, with no military purpose and culturally important in any case, would have been extremely unlikely to have been the subject of an Allied air attack, in 1943 Hitler ordered that these collections be moved. Beginning in February 1944, the artworks were relocated to the 14th-century Steinberg salt mines above the village of Altaussee, code-named "Dora".[5][9][2] The project took 13 months to complete, and utilized both tanks and oxen when the trucks could not navigate the roads because of the winter weather. The final convoy of purloined art arrived at the mine in April 1945, just weeks before V-E Day.[2]
The labyrinthine salt mine has a single entrance, and a small gasoline-powered narrow-gauge engine pulling a flat car was utilized to navigate to the various caverns created by centuries of salt mining. Into these spaces, workmen built storage rooms which boasted wooden floors, racks specifically designed to hold the paintings and other art works, up-to-date lighting, and, perhaps most importantly, dehumidification equipment.[2]
According to James S. Plaut, who from November 1944 to April 1946 was Director of the Art Looting Investigation Unit of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the salt mines held:
6755 old master paintings, of which 5350 were destined for Linz, 230 drawings, 1039 prints, 95 tapestries, 68 sculptures, 43 cases of objects d'art, and innumerable pieces of furniture; in addition, 119 cases of books from Hitler's library in Berlin, and 237 cases of books for the Linz library.[2]
Detailed records were kept at Dresden and moved to Schloss Weißenstein at the end of the war, where they were confiscated by the Russians, but these were primarily of the paintings stored in Munich in the Fuhrerbau.[8]
As the Allied troops approached the salt mines of Altaussee, August Eigruber, Gauleiter of Upper Austria, gave orders to blow it up; Hitler countermanded the order, but after his suicide Eigruber ignored this. He fled with an elite SS bodyguard, fully expecting his order of destruction to be carried out. Nevertheless, this did not happen, thanks to the workmen ordered to undertake the job, who had been threatened with death by firing squad if they did not obey. Instead, they simply blew up the entrance to the mine, and no damage was done to the irreplaceable and priceless collection inside.[2] Most of the collection of 12,000 paintings were recovered.[27]
The Altaussee trove included both works meant specifically for the Führermuseum and other looted artwork as well. Other caches of art not meant for Linz were recovered in over 400 places elsewhere within the Reich; Göring's collection from his estate at Carinhall was discovered in a cave at Berchtesgaden, where he had a summer home so as to be near Hitler at the Berghof.[2]
Post-war
After the war, the American Art Looting Investigation Unit (ALIU) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) made thirteen detailed reports on the Linz museum and the Nazi plundering of art.[29] These reports were synthesised into four consolidated reports; the fourth of these was written by S. Lane Faison covering the Führermuseum.[29] These reports focused on returning art to rightful owners. The authority for this was the 1943 Declaration of London, which invalidated all German art purchases in the occupied territories. Most of the paintings and other artworks were brought to the 'Central Collecting Point" in Munich, where they were registered and rephotographed if necessary. Restitutions occurred as early as autumn 1945. The work was turned over to German authorities in September 1949. In 1962, the responsible agency was disbanded, and the remaining unreturnable artworks were assessed for their value as museum items. These were loaned to various museums, while other pieces are on loan to government agencies.[8]
In Eastern Europe, Soviet premier Joseph Stalin tasked Mikhail Khrapchenko with taking many of the Führermuseum artworks to stock Soviet art galleries.[5] Khrapchenko said "it would now be possible to turn Moscow’s Pushkin Museum into one of the world’s great museums, like the British Museum, the Louvre, or the Hermitage."[citation needed]
In 1998, the Federal Republic of Germany and 43 other countries agreed to the "Washington Principles", which required them to closely inspect their art inventories to establish the provenance of works which had changed ownership between 1933 and 1945. In particular, German, France, Austria and Holland and other countries publicly disclosed what artworks from the Sonderauftrag Linz collection remained in their inventories. The work began in Germany in 2000, and artworks which are "shown by renewed research to involve a persecution-related deprivation of property during the National Socialist period are to be returned."[8] In his book Das Braune Haus der Kunst: Hitler und der "Sonderauftrag Linz" ("The Brown House of Art and the 'Sonderauftrag Linz'"), published in Germnay in 2005, Hans Christian Löhr argued that 191 artworks were missing at that time, and that they may be hanging in museums or private collections.[10] This is discussed in the documentary The Rape of Europa and in Noah Charney's book about The Ghent Altarpiece, Stealing the Mystic Lamb.
As of 2010, a photo album that an American soldier took from the Berghof, Hitler's vacation home, which catalogued artwork Hitler desired for the museum, was to be returned to Germany. Of the photo albums created for Hitler, 39 of them were discovered by American armed forces at Neuschwanstein, where they had been deposited for safekeeping in April 1945. These were used as evidence in the Nuremberg trials, and are now at the United States National Archives, with two others donated by Robert Edsel in 2007 and c.2013. Edsel is the author of the book The Monuments Men about the activities of the Allied Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives program (MFAA), on which the film of the same name was based, and founder of the Monuments Men Foundation for the Preservation of Art. He got the two albums from the heirs of an American soldier. Nineteen other albums recovered from Berchtesgaden were in Germany on permanent loan from the German Federal Archives (Bundesarchiv) to the German Historical Museum as of 2010, and 11 albums are considered to be lost.[30][31][8]
See also
- Nazi loot
- Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives program (MFAA, the "monuments men")
- The Monuments Men (film)
- 2012 Munich artworks discovery
References
Notes
- ^ a b c d e f "The Führer’s prerogative and the planned Führer Museum in Linz" Art Database of the National Fund of the Republic of Austria for Victims of National Socialism website
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae Plaut (1946)
- ^ a b c Kershaw (2000), pp.777-778
- ^ Bell, Bethany (3 November 2008), "Hitler's Austrian 'culture capital'", BBC News, retrieved 13 December 2008
- ^ a b c "Hitler's Museum", Intelligent Television, retrieved 13 December 2008
- ^ Decree issued by Reich Minister and Head of the Chancellery of the Reich, June 18, 1938. Vienna, Federal Office for the Protection of Monuments, archive, restitution files, box 8/1, fascicle 1. As facsimile in: Theodor Brückler (publ.), Kunstraub, Kunstbergung und Restitution in Österreich 1938 bis heute, Vienna-Cologne-Weimar, 1999, at 157. quoted in "The Führer’s prerogative and the planned Führer Museum in Linz" Art Database of the National Fund of the Republic of Austria for Victims of National Socialism website
- ^ Edsel with Witter (2009), p.15
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Enderlein, Angelika; Flacke, Monika and Löhr, Hanns Christian. "Database on the Sonderauftrag Linz (Special Commission: Linz): History of the Linz collection German Historical Museum
- ^ a b Lohr, Hanns (20 November 2000), No Looted Art in Hitler's Museum in Linz, retrieved 13 December 2008
- ^ a b DW Staff (24 August 2008). "The Mystery of Hitler's Lost Art Collection". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 13 December 2008.
- ^ Schwarz, Birgit. "Sonderauftrag Linz km und „Führermuseum“", in: Ausst.-Kat. Raub und Restitution, Jüdisches Museum Berlin 2008 pp. 127–133 ISBN 978-3-8353-0361-4
- ^ a b c Edsel with Witter (2009), pp.126-130
- ^ Edsel with Witter (2009), p.31
- ^ Edsel with Witter (2009), pp.42-43
- ^ Edsel with Witter (2009), p.49
- ^ Schwarz, Birgit. "Hitlers Museum". Die Fotoalben Gemäldegalerie Linz. Wien, Böhlau Verlag, 2004. ISBN 3-205-77054-4
- ^ Schwarz, Birgit. "Hitler's Museum", in: Vitalizing Memory. International Perspectives on Provenance Research, Washington 2005, S. pp.51-54
- ^ "Database on the Sonderauftrag Linz (Special Commission: Linz)" Deutsches Historisches Museum
- ^ Löhr, Hanns Christian. Das Braune Haus der Kunst: Hitler und der "Sonderauftrag Linz". Berlin Akademie Verlag, 2005. ISBN 978-3-05-004156-8.
- ^ a b Robinson, Walter (25 November 1997). "Sotheby's takes work tied to Nazis off". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 18 April 2003. Retrieved 13 December 2008.
- ^ Schwarz, Birgit. "Kampf der Zentauren daheim" Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, (17 October 2005), p. 40; actually, Lohr treats these deposits on pages 135 and 136 of his book
- ^ Whetton, Cris. Hitler's Fortune. Barnsley: Pen and Sword (2005)
- ^ Interviewed on "Hitler's Riches"
- ^ Dutch Restitution Commission RC 1.78, Consideration 5 and 16, retrieved 7 April 2014
- ^ Dutch Restitution Commission RC 1.90 B, Consideration 21, retrieved 7 April 2014
- ^ Art historian Godfrey Barker, interviewed on "Hitler's Riches"
- ^ a b "Hitler's Riches"
- ^ Kershaw (2000), p.821
- ^ a b Petropolous, Prof. Jonathan, Linz: Hitler's Museum and Library: Consolidated Interrogation Report No. 4, 15 December 1945, The Reports of the Office of Strategic Services Art Looting Investigation Unit, retrieved 13 December 2008
- ^ "WWII veteran had Hitler's art book on bookshelf" San Diego Union-Tribune (December 9, 2009) Accessed: March 3, 2015
- ^ "National Archives Announces Discovery of "Hitler Albums" Documenting Looted Art" (press release) United States National Archives (November 1, 2007)
Bibliography
- Edsel, Robert M. with Witter, Bret. The Monuments Men. New York: Center Street, 2009. ISBN 978-1-59995-150-8
- Hitler's Riches (TV documentary) TVT Productions / Smithsonian Networks co-production in association with Channel 5 (2014)
- Kershaw, Ian. Hitler: 1936-45: Nemesis New York: Norton, 2000. ISBN 0-393-04994-9. pp.777-778
- Plaut, James S. "Hitler's Capital" The Atlantic (October 1946)
Further reading
- Schwarz, Birgit. "Le Führermuseum de Hitler et la Mission spéciale Linz" in: Gob, André. Des musées au-dessus de tout soupcon, Paris 2007, pp. 164–176. ISBN 978-2-200-35099-4
- Spotts, Frederic. Hitler and the power of aesthetics. Woodstock & New York 2003, pp. 188–220. ISBN 1-58567-345-5.
External links
- "Plunder and Restitution" Report of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Holocaust Assets in the United States
- "Online database of Linz Special Collection", German Historical Museum; Covers 4747 works, paintings, sculptures, furniture, porcelain, and tapestries confiscated between the late 1930s and 1945, for the Linz museum, and also for other collections.
- "Lost Art Internet Database"