Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) |
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) →Torres: concerns |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
More anon. --<small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">[[User:Ohconfucius|'''<span style="color:#000000; background-color:#00FF00"> Ohc </span>''']]</span></small>[[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>''¡digame!</sup><sub>¿que pasa?''</sub>]] 07:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
More anon. --<small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">[[User:Ohconfucius|'''<span style="color:#000000; background-color:#00FF00"> Ohc </span>''']]</span></small>[[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>''¡digame!</sup><sub>¿que pasa?''</sub>]] 07:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
*We can do that. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA#top|talk]]) 08:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
*We can do that. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA#top|talk]]) 08:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
*Having read the article and most of the sources, I would just mention some concerns I have about the notability and a possible AFD the article might face: The guy isn't notable, at best [[WP:BLP1E]]. It's like a black hole, and these things seem to happen down there almost on a daily basis. Armando's still an open investigation, and all the news seems to be about that; the news reports look pretty repetitious. There is a lot of speculation. --<small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">[[User:Ohconfucius|'''<span style="color:#000000; background-color:#00FF00"> Ohc </span>''']]</span></small>[[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>''¡digame!</sup><sub>¿que pasa?''</sub>]] 08:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:33, 11 June 2013
Thanks much
Thank you for joining WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech !!! — Cirt (talk) 02:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- And thank you for the invitation! ComputerJA (talk) 03:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Adding photos
ComputerJA, have you recorded anywhere the lessons you've learned while uploading photos. I've been watching you do that for sometimes (from afar and in total admiration)! I've seen some of your uploads deleted and others remain and reattempts made. I would like to do something similar and have my students also do this (and for the same project: Safety of Journalists), but I think it would be better if we could learn the process from somebody who has been through the process. Do you have any notes? Crtew (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, Crtew. I only know how to upload non-free images of people that are deceased or disappeared without having any copyright problems. With non-free images of living people, it's up to the Wikipedia Photo Gestapo to decide. Most of them are decided on a case-by-case basis; for example, I argued that the photo of Gustavo González Castro should stay because although he is a living person, finding him would require government/police intelligence. The image managed to stay, but I haven't been so lucky with others. I'm not sure what kind of photos you plan to upload with your students, but I what do often is try to mirror the format of other users. I usually copy and past the format ( [ like this, for example) from other people and then just change the information to the journalist I'm writing about. My suggestion is to always look for a free image first (either on Flickr or by e-mailing the organization where a journalist is from and asking for permission--although I've never gotten a response from the latter). Hope this helps. Let me know if you have other concerns. Best, ComputerJA (talk) 20:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:LosZetas-logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:LosZetas-logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
GA nomination of Antonio Cárdenas Guillén
The article nominated by you is successfully passed as a GA status. Suri 100 (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! Much appreciated. ComputerJA (talk) 07:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Torres
Hi, I'm having some problems tying text to the citations. For example, Chaires is not named in either citation 10 or 11. That seems to be in citation 13. When I look to citations 13 and 14 for allegation of drug cartel links. I don't see anything.
- I added ref 13 behind 10 and 11 per Chaires mention. Now, in Proceso's article, is says this: "La Procuraduría investiga a cinco integrantes de la familia Pecina Chaires por el delito de privación ilegal de la libertad, ya que alguno de sus miembros mantiene vínculos con el crimen organizado." (Translation: "The Attorney investigates five family members Pecina Chaires for the crime of illegal deprivation of liberty, and that one of its members has ties to organized crime.") Original and Google translate The other US source says that the kidnapping is believed to be cartel related.
- Sorry I missed that one – proves my spanish isn't that hot. :-( -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 08:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
The sources all quote Cristina as saying "a couple men", yet the text says several. I just find it strange how a couple of guys can make off with a load of stuff, three hostages, and three cars.
- Good catch on that one. Spanish sources mention "group of armed men" or simply "armed men." Should we stick with "gunmen"? If there were only two guys, then it would be impossible for them to steal 3 vehicles Facepalm. ABC7 source mentions the three vehicles...
I've also noticed that some of the reports are agency reports, and are very similar. I also found 5, 6 and 10 are identical reports, which can be consolidated into one ref. More anon. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 07:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- We can do that. ComputerJA (talk) 08:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Having read the article and most of the sources, I would just mention some concerns I have about the notability and a possible AFD the article might face: The guy isn't notable, at best WP:BLP1E. It's like a black hole, and these things seem to happen down there almost on a daily basis. Armando's still an open investigation, and all the news seems to be about that; the news reports look pretty repetitious. There is a lot of speculation. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 08:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)