Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
*'''Keep''', would lead to other unneeded deletions -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]][[WP:EA|<font color="green">a</font>]] 13:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', would lead to other unneeded deletions -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]][[WP:EA|<font color="green">a</font>]] 13:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''KEEP''', the fact that this was nominated for deletion demonstrates the need for it to exist in the first place. Userboxes demonstrate that we are comprised of people with diverse views. [[User:Kukini|Kukini]] 14:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''KEEP''', the fact that this was nominated for deletion demonstrates the need for it to exist in the first place. Userboxes demonstrate that we are comprised of people with diverse views. [[User:Kukini|Kukini]] 14:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' --[[User:Terenceong1992|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terenceong1992|nc]][[User talk:Terenceong1992|e Ong]] 14:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:User bicycling]] ==== |
==== [[Template:User bicycling]] ==== |
Revision as of 14:45, 23 February 2006
February 22, 2006
Template: User feminist-alt
Template:User feminist-alt ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The submitter initially typoed this as "feminist-alt" instead of "User feminist-alt".
- Keep Hey, why not? Mego'brien
Comment Who speedied this? I can really make an informed opinion when the template is a red link and can't be seen by a non-admin like me. - Hbdragon88 23:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)- No-one speedied it, it was just that the nominator misspelled the name of the template. JYolkowski // talk 00:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have struck out my comment. - Hbdragon88 00:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- No-one speedied it, it was just that the nominator misspelled the name of the template. JYolkowski // talk 00:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, I can't seem to make the link work. Mego'brien
- Keep All userboxes should be kept. helohe (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Subst and delete, redundant and not needed in the template namespace. JYolkowski // talk 00:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Subst and Delete - Could potentially contribute to factionalization. (Contemplate if someone had a box declaring them not to be a feminist.) Michael Ralston 01:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. And it's not redundant, because it attracts a certain type of feminist. Which is why quite a few people are using it instead. Sarge Baldy 04:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as above MiraLuka 05:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - an important part of cultural identity that should not be censored. Ronline ✉ 07:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep builds community.Dark jedi requiem 09:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Ditto on comments of Sarge Baldy. Kukini 14:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Terence Ong 14:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Gameinfo
Template:Gameinfo ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
For reasons stated at Template talk:Wikicities. Only siste projects are given box treatment, not any wiki, not even Wikicities. Hbdragon88 22:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Brian Kendig 02:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This belongs as an external link, if anything. Pagrashtak 03:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Oh My Goddess Extlnk
Template:Oh My Goddess Extlnk ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Was intended for the purpose of linking to the same eight fan sites from every Ah My Goddess article (72 in all). I removed the fan site links; now the only link left is to the Ah My Goddess official web site, and a template isn't needed for that. - Brian Kendig 20:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SushiGeek 02:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Gameinfo2
Template:Gameinfo2 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Not a sister project. Fredrik Johansson 18:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons stated above. I don't believe it should encompass other Wikicities wikis. They can be put in external links if need be but not as a template. - Hbdragon88 22:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Brian Kendig 02:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This belongs as an external link, if anything. Pagrashtak 03:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:User queer-4
- Keep I see no reason to delete this template and want to keep it as a way of expressing my support for this community. Mego'brien
- keep the same reasons I usually vote... builds a stronger community on the 'pedia. Mike McGregor (Can) 14:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep can you at least explain why you want it deleted? --D-Day Somebody talk to me. Please somebody! Anybody! 14:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It's a good template and I see no good reason to delete it. Dark jedi requiem
- Why was this deleted when no one voted against it?
- Keep. Another example of someone trying to take Jimbo's comments and divine policy without explict command or concensus. --StuffOfInterest 17:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- I see yet again someone (JoJan) decided to delete in the middle of the TfD listing. --StuffOfInterest 19:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- I have restored the template. - Brian Kendig 22:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you! --StuffOfInterest 12:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- I have restored the template. - Brian Kendig 22:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- I see yet again someone (JoJan) decided to delete in the middle of the TfD listing. --StuffOfInterest 19:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep What's the problem here? - • The Giant Puffin • 17:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As per above. Chairman S. | Talk 19:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. I see the sense in Jimbo's reasoning. [1] I am glad that there are Wikipedia editors from all stripes of life, but the existence of these sorts of official-looking userboxes makes Wikipedia look like it is edited by activists. I won't vote against this one because it's no worse than others, but I personally would like to see the userbox fad go away. - Brian Kendig 22:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As per above. helohe (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - can easily allow pov-pushing and/or ballot-stuffing. Likewise, the opposite of that template would seem to be pretty divisive. Michael Ralston 23:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. SushiGeek 02:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. For all the reasons listed above. Sarge Baldy 04:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete There's other, similar userboxes that accomplish the same purpose without being a flak magnet. --InShaneee 04:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as above MiraLuka 04:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep - an important part of cultural identity at Wikipedia, and forms a stronger community, which directly contributes to the encyclopedia-building process. Ronline ✉ 07:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per CSD:T1. Stifle 11:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, would lead to other unneeded deletions -- Natalya 13:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP, the fact that this was nominated for deletion demonstrates the need for it to exist in the first place. Userboxes demonstrate that we are comprised of people with diverse views. Kukini 14:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Terence Ong 14:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:User bicycling
Template:User bicycling ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Clearly CSD T1, because I do not know how to bike and I feel that other editors are taunting me and dividing the Wiki community by using this userbox. I decided to TFD instead of speedy-delete, though, b/c I respect process. --M@rēino 05:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete userbox because it is in template space and delete user for WP:POINT violation and bad faith nomination. --Cyde Weys 05:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for supporting my deletion nomination, but please don't delete me. I really do loathe bicycles. If I really wanted to violate WP:POINT, I'd nominate template:user ubx-N--M@rēino 05:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, this deletion is unnecessary. (Bias warning: I created this template.) jareha 06:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete but the template is unnecesary as well -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 06:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Folks, pick your battles. How is this inflammatory? How is it polemic? How is it divisive? It isn't. It's just a statement of a user liking a common activity. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 06:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Titoxd, we can't delete it just because it tells the user's likes. If we do so, we have to delete most of the other userboxes because they tell i use firefox, or i believe in aliens, etc. Moonkey 06:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, as this userbox is not an attack or political. --Terence Ong 07:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems perfectly harmless, as userboxes go. Flowerparty■ 09:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Move to user: space. It is not a TEMPLATE FOR USE IN AN ARTICLE, which is what the Template: namespace is for. Sorry to shout, but people just aren't getting this. Proto||type 11:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Why not ? I like it. No harm done. Malbano 11:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, Stating that I enjoy biking is in no way a personal attack. Is my user box stating that I enjoy knitting a taunt?? Or that a user was fluent in german..etc. etc., I do not understand why this template would be up for deletion. Rachel Ayres 11:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It does not appear "divisive or inflammatory" to me to say "this user enjoys bicycling". Slambo (Speak) 11:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. T1 needs better definition to make it objective. Getting userboxes out of template space needs to be set in official policy rather than derived intention. Mass nomination and speedy deleletion has gone well past WP:POINT. --StuffOfInterest 12:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, hold all your actions (i.e. both creation and deletion) and instead of wasting your precious time on DRV's/TfD's start working on a solution (or write an encyclopedia instead - it's not done the last time I've checked). Hint: there is a solution being worked out - why don't you join? Misza13 (Talk) 14:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep and listen to what Misza13 has to say. The war is just about over. --D-Day Somebody talk to me. Please somebody! Anybody! 14:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Is this a joke? You nominated it because you dont like the subject of cycling?!? This is got to be one of, if not the, most stupid and unnesecary TfD nomination I have seen - • The Giant Puffin • 17:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I hope the guys @ WP:BJAODN have a lot new titles ready, 'cause once it's all over, new stuff (like this discussion or under {{user nocol}} from Feb 21) is gonna flow in there like a river... Misza13 (Talk) 17:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. SushiGeek 23:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As per above. helohe (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Pilotguy (talk ¦ ✉) 23:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Move to User Space - Doesn't belong in template space, but doesn't seem as if it could be used for POV Pushing or ballot stuffing. Michael Ralston 23:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - as per above. Ronline ✉ 07:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Does'nt anyone see the nom is taking the piss! Speedy keep, and put the nom out of his misery. Nobody has been ROTFLing. --Bduke 09:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -It is a sad thing to disparage others for what they enjoy doing. I think we should delete this type of TfD nominations. Kukini 14:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria infobox
Template:Bulgaria infobox ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused Bulgarian template that is largely superseded by the template currently on Bulgaria. Apologies if I missed anything while trying to list this up for deletion (it's my first time). Delete. Bash 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 07:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 09:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Perhaps CSD-T2 needs to be "template unlinked more than 14 days since last edit" to speed up housekeeping deletions. --StuffOfInterest 12:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria
Template:Bulgaria ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Same as above. Delete. Bash 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 09:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Perhaps CSD-T2 needs to be "template unlinked more than 14 days since last edit" to speed up housekeeping deletions. --StuffOfInterest 12:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria Infobox
Template:Bulgaria Infobox ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Same as above. Delete. Bash 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 09:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Perhaps CSD-T2 needs to be "template unlinked more than 14 days since last edit" to speed up housekeeping deletions. --StuffOfInterest 12:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Olympic Summer Games Host Cities
Template:Olympic Summer Games Host Cities ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Same reasons as at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 16#Template:Eurovision Song Contest host cities, this information is too trivial to warrant a big box at the end of every major city's article. If people are looking for it they'll find the Summer Olympic Games page and a perfectly useful list there. Delete Flowerparty■ 00:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. I've found this box quite useful in the past, and it is no more trivial than any other template of this kind. Chairman S. | Talk 01:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, useful template. --Terence Ong 07:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- comment: I didn't mean to suggest that the template was useless - I'm sure some people will find it very useful. But I can't think a significant proportion of the visitors to the Montreal page, say, will be there seeking information on the Olympics that were held there in 1976 - certainly not enough to justify adding another navigation template to an already cluttered foot of the page. The point is that articles about cities are of largely geographical interest, and any navigation box at the bottom really ought to link to other cities on the basis of some shared geographical status, not because thay've all hosted a sports event which lasted two weeks and took place maybe several decades ago. Otherwise why not create templates for the IAAF World Championships in Athletics or the Commonwealth or Pan American Games? Flowerparty■ 09:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain. I question if this could be better accomplished with a list page or/and category rather than including so much info on the city page unrelated to a city. --StuffOfInterest 12:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment What is the point of this template? They don't point to an actual page about that year's olympics, just a link to the generic city where it aas hosted at. Do we have inidvidual pages on each olympics? If so, they should be added in there and the template would be a much better navigation aid. - Hbdragon88 22:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, we do have such pages, see Template:Olympic Games, which is included on the Summer Olympic Games page. Flowerparty■ 23:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Useful enough, not purely "trivial". SushiGeek 23:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, {{Olympic Games}} is more effective at accomplishing the purpose of this template, in my opinion. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 23:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The same arguments could be made to Template:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities as well. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Fair point, I hadn't noticed that one. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 23#Template:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities. Flowerparty■ 00:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Replace with Category or List, then Delete - Doesn't make sense as a template, when it would serve better as one of the other two. Michael Ralston 23:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - useful. Ronline ✉ 07:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Make category and delete. Again, it's too big and is not relevant to anybody looking at the article on the city. Having a Category:Summer Olympic Games Host Cities or the like would be more than enough. Stifle 11:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)