StuffOfInterest (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*'''Keep''', Stating that I enjoy biking is in no way a personal attack. Is my user box stating that I enjoy knitting a taunt?? Or that a user was fluent in german..etc. etc., I do not understand why this template would be up for deletion. [[User:Rachel Ayres|Rachel Ayres]] 11:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', Stating that I enjoy biking is in no way a personal attack. Is my user box stating that I enjoy knitting a taunt?? Or that a user was fluent in german..etc. etc., I do not understand why this template would be up for deletion. [[User:Rachel Ayres|Rachel Ayres]] 11:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' It does not appear "divisive or inflammatory" to me to say "this user enjoys bicycling". [[User:Slambo|Slambo]] <small><font color="black">[[User talk:Slambo|(Speak)]]</font></small> 11:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' It does not appear "divisive or inflammatory" to me to say "this user enjoys bicycling". [[User:Slambo|Slambo]] <small><font color="black">[[User talk:Slambo|(Speak)]]</font></small> 11:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. T1 needs better definition to make it objective. Getting userboxes out of template space needs to be set in official policy rather than derived intention. Mass nomination and speedy deleletion has gone well past [[WP:POINT]]. --[[User:StuffOfInterest|StuffOfInterest]] 12:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Bulgaria infobox]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Bulgaria infobox]] ==== |
Revision as of 12:25, 22 February 2006
February 22, 2006
Template:User bicycling
Template:User bicycling ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Clearly CSD T1, because I do not know how to bike and I feel that other editors are taunting me and dividing the Wiki community by using this userbox. I decided to TFD instead of speedy-delete, though, b/c I respect process. --M@rēino 05:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete userbox because it is in template space and delete user for WP:POINT violation and bad faith nomination. --Cyde Weys 05:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for supporting my deletion nomination, but please don't delete me. I really do loathe bicycles. If I really wanted to violate WP:POINT, I'd nominate template:user ubx-N--M@rēino 05:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, this deletion is unnecessary. (Bias warning: I created this template.) jareha 06:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete but the template is unnecesary as well -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 06:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Folks, pick your battles. How is this inflammatory? How is it polemic? How is it divisive? It isn't. It's just a statement of a user liking a common activity. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 06:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Titoxd, we can't delete it just because it tells the user's likes. If we do so, we have to delete most of the other userboxes because they tell i use firefox, or i believe in aliens, etc. Moonkey 06:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, as this userbox is not an attack or political. --Terence Ong 07:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems perfectly harmless, as userboxes go. Flowerparty■ 09:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Move to user: space. It is not a TEMPLATE FOR USE IN AN ARTICLE, which is what the Template: namespace is for. Sorry to shout, but people just aren't getting this. Proto||type 11:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Why not ? I like it. No harm done. Malbano 11:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, Stating that I enjoy biking is in no way a personal attack. Is my user box stating that I enjoy knitting a taunt?? Or that a user was fluent in german..etc. etc., I do not understand why this template would be up for deletion. Rachel Ayres 11:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It does not appear "divisive or inflammatory" to me to say "this user enjoys bicycling". Slambo (Speak) 11:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. T1 needs better definition to make it objective. Getting userboxes out of template space needs to be set in official policy rather than derived intention. Mass nomination and speedy deleletion has gone well past WP:POINT. --StuffOfInterest 12:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria infobox
Template:Bulgaria infobox ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused Bulgarian template that is largely superseded by the template currently on Bulgaria. Apologies if I missed anything while trying to list this up for deletion (it's my first time). Delete. Bash 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 07:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 09:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria
Template:Bulgaria ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Same as above. Delete. Bash 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 09:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Bulgaria Infobox
Template:Bulgaria Infobox ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Same as above. Delete. Bash 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chairman S. | Talk 09:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Template:Olympic Summer Games Host Cities
Template:Olympic Summer Games Host Cities ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Same reasons as at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 16#Template:Eurovision Song Contest host cities, this information is too trivial to warrant a big box at the end of every major city's article. If people are looking for it they'll find the Summer Olympic Games page and a perfectly useful list there. Delete Flowerparty■ 00:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. I've found this box quite useful in the past, and it is no more trivial than any other template of this kind. Chairman S. | Talk 01:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, useful template. --Terence Ong 07:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- comment: I didn't mean to suggest that the template was useless - I'm sure some people will find it very useful. But I can't think a significant proportion of the visitors to the Montreal page, say, will be there seeking information on the Olympics that were held there in 1976 - certainly not enough to justify adding another navigation template to an already cluttered foot of the page. The point is that articles about cities are of largely geographical interest, and any navigation box at the bottom really ought to link to other cities on the basis of some shared geographical status, not because thay've all hosted a sports event which lasted two weeks and took place maybe several decades ago. Otherwise why not create templates for the IAAF World Championships in Athletics or the Commonwealth or Pan American Games? Flowerparty■ 09:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)