65.122.125.226 (talk) |
|||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Maybe we should not worry so much about having a wiki article, and worry more about what are actual post-rock bands. IMO stick to Post-Rock/Post-Metal and maybe Math Rock bands. Straying into Experimental, Stoner, Metal bands seems a bit excessive. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/65.122.125.226|65.122.125.226]] ([[User talk:65.122.125.226|talk]]) 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
Maybe we should not worry so much about having a wiki article, and worry more about what are actual post-rock bands. IMO stick to Post-Rock/Post-Metal and maybe Math Rock bands. Straying into Experimental, Stoner, Metal bands seems a bit excessive. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/65.122.125.226|65.122.125.226]] ([[User talk:65.122.125.226|talk]]) 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
||
:Please see this: |
|||
:''As per Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD#Lists, unless there are any qualms with it, I'm going to remove the artists from the list who don't have a page. As it exists now, it's entirely useless. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 22:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)'' |
|||
:We must worry about whether bands have an article by our own guidelines. If a band is notable and doesn't have an article, perhaps starting one should be your major concern. I do agree that the list has problems (your "Toe") example is good as well as having bands that are definitely not post-rock on the list, and those should be cleaned up. But we shouldn't go adding bands that don't have articles. |
|||
:– [[User:Moonty|moonty]] ([[User talk:Moonty|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Moonty|contribs]]) 19:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:58, 6 April 2007
Boards Of Canada
Boards Of Canada dont belong here either, the way they use instruments, compose and their sound is not what would be called post-rock. They are better placed in a list of ambient or electronic groups. -Itmplyurvyld
American Analog Set
I think most will agree that the American Analog Set definitely does not belong on this list. I removed them. -keremm
Check out Template:Amg. Since the group's style is defined as ambient-space rock, the listing is valid... Folajimi 11:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
All Music does not specifically list them as post-rock though. They just happen to share some of the same arbitrary adjectives with the genre. Moreover, they don't sound much like any of the bands that AMG specifically lists as post-rock. Keremm 18:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Tommy Guerrero
By what strange definition of post rock is Tommy Guerrero included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.47.148 (talk • contribs)
- Well, don't just stand there — do something! ;) --Folajimi 16:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Raison d'être
Now that I think of it, what is the purpose of this list? After all, the post-rock groups category seems to be more comprehensive, and is perhaps a more prudent way to raise the issues which have been discussed here.
In other words, the concerns raised here would be better addressed on the talk page of the subjects in question. --Folajimi 14:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Country
Just something minor. Should we keep the locations as countries only? Or should cities/states or provinces be included as well? I personally prefer simply listing the countries, for more details people can view the specific Wiki article. Right now with all the specific city/state/province the page is getting quite messy to view. Specificity should not be the purpose of this post rock list. 24.87.7.121 02:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
RE: Raison d'être
The page only incudes bands that have a Wiki page. Bands that do not have a Wiki page are not listed in , but are in List of Post Rock Bands. The List of Post Rock Bands page might raise awareness which might lead to future Wiki article creations. 24.87.7.121 02:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Is Bjork Post-Rock?
I dont think so, maybe her music is related to, but I have no reasons for include Bjork in this genre.
The Bjork´s wiki page, says about Genres: Pop, Trip-Hop, Rock, Vocal jazz, Ambient, Electronica, Dance, Alternative.
What do u think?
Removal of red-linked artists
As per Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD#Lists, unless there are any qualms with it, I'm going to remove the artists from the list who don't have a page. As it exists now, it's entirely useless. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 22:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, why not, and don't forget the link spam (artists with only an external link). On another note, if all bands with articles are added to Category:Post-rock groups, this list would be superfluous and could be deleted. Punkmorten 00:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
post metal bands
IMHO we should toggle post metal bands (i.e. Isis), since this is a list of post rock bands and there is also a list for post metal bands. Connacht 17:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Additions/Deletions
Any reason in particular that notable post-rock bands such as September Malevolance and Up-C, Down-C, etc have been removed, yet we have straight metal/metalcore bands such as "I" and "Inner Surge"??
It seems the list was edited to remove anything without a Wiki article, yet not edited to reflect true post-rock bands nor notability (for example "Toe" redirects to the body part and the disambiguation points to two post-rock bands named Toe of which neither have wiki articles).
Maybe we should not worry so much about having a wiki article, and worry more about what are actual post-rock bands. IMO stick to Post-Rock/Post-Metal and maybe Math Rock bands. Straying into Experimental, Stoner, Metal bands seems a bit excessive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.122.125.226 (talk) 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
- Please see this:
- As per Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD#Lists, unless there are any qualms with it, I'm going to remove the artists from the list who don't have a page. As it exists now, it's entirely useless. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 22:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- We must worry about whether bands have an article by our own guidelines. If a band is notable and doesn't have an article, perhaps starting one should be your major concern. I do agree that the list has problems (your "Toe") example is good as well as having bands that are definitely not post-rock on the list, and those should be cleaned up. But we shouldn't go adding bands that don't have articles.
- – moonty (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)