No edit summary |
Comment (using spihelper.js) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* Just as a provisional comment before I step out (may clerk this later, may not), I agree with Pbritti that there isn't a strong case for [[User:Prcc27|Prcc27]]'s suggestion of {{checkuser|StardustToStardust}}. [https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=KlayCax&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki&users=StardustToStardust EIA] shows at least two direct conflicts between KC and STS, and while "3D chess" sockuppetry like that does happen, it's quite rare, so we'd need very strong evidence to pursue an investigation on that front. No comment for now on the main allegation. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- [[User:Tamzin|<span style="color:#E6007A">Tamzin</span>]]</span><sup class="nowrap">[[[User talk:Tamzin|<i style="color:#E6007A">cetacean needed</i>]]]</sup> <small>(they|xe|she)</small> 22:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 22:39, 21 December 2023
KlayCax
- KlayCax (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
21 December 2023
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- ShirtNShoesPls (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
ShirtNShoesPls (SNSP) is a new account, created on 7 November during a one-week block on KlayCax's (KC) account. Since then, SNSP has made over 40% of their edits to pages edited by KC (log). The overlap is primarily in three contentious topics: current American politics, genitalia/circumcision, and Catholic-LGBT issues. In each of these spaces, both KC and SNSP take what might be considered a "liberal" view. A review of editing times (KC, SNSP) reveals substantial overlap. For a new editor, SNSP is familiar with concepts like RFCs and false balance. Like KC, SNSP likes pushing the 3RR limit. Two other editors, including the admin who blocked KC, have endorsed this SPI's opening. (One of them also mentioned another editor who seems similar in naming conventions and behavior to SNSP, but this third account's interactions make me feel like they are most likely unrelated.) ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Just as a provisional comment before I step out (may clerk this later, may not), I agree with Pbritti that there isn't a strong case for Prcc27's suggestion of StardustToStardust (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). EIA shows at least two direct conflicts between KC and STS, and while "3D chess" sockuppetry like that does happen, it's quite rare, so we'd need very strong evidence to pursue an investigation on that front. No comment for now on the main allegation. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 22:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)