BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1187236498 by BeanieFan11 (talk) found better place to comment Tag: Undo |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
all implications of successful election should be made more prominent and communicated to voters.--[[User:RZuo|RZuo]] ([[User talk:RZuo|talk]]) 07:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
all implications of successful election should be made more prominent and communicated to voters.--[[User:RZuo|RZuo]] ([[User talk:RZuo|talk]]) 07:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
:That is a good idea. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 19:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==Archival of election material== |
==Archival of election material== |
Revision as of 19:20, 29 November 2023
2023 Arbitration Committee Elections
Status as of 08:51 (UTC), Thursday, 30 May 2024 (
)
- Thank you for participating in the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. The certified results have been posted.
- You are invited to leave feedback on the election process.
Clearer summary of implications
i wasnt aware until today that elected members become checkusers. Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee has no mention of this implication either. it's only implied by Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight ("While most current and some former arbitrators hold CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions") and some sentences after long passages on Wikipedia:CheckUser.
i always had the impression or assumption from real life that arbitrators are third-party members of the public (maybe like a jury or lay judges), and not members of law enforcement or judiciary. i thought they're users elected to exercise independent judgement of sysops' and checkusers' actions, but didnt know they would become the checkusers themselves.
you could probably do a survey to see how many voters are aware. i've already voted in 2021 and 2022 elections. i became aware because only by chance i noticed a user was checkuser but i had no memory of a checkuser election of that user, then i dug further to find out the appointment logs on meta.
all implications of successful election should be made more prominent and communicated to voters.--RZuo (talk) 07:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Archival of election material
all material that has been used in elections should be archived. i raised this concern previously https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&oldid=1187066048#Why_can_election_material_be_deleted_after_elections%EF%BC%9F . you can see the result of deletion of election material, a red link in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:ACE2022&oldid=1124416539 . this is bad for scrutiny of election and detrimental to integrity of election. RZuo (talk) 07:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)