→February 2021: Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban |
Newslinger (talk | contribs) →Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban: Arbitration enforcement action appeal declined |
||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|the appeals process]]. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction/topicban.--> [[User:El_C|El_C]] 15:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)}} |
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|the appeals process]]. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction/topicban.--> [[User:El_C|El_C]] 15:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)}} |
||
=== Arbitration enforcement action appeal === |
|||
NomanPK44, your arbitration enforcement action appeal has been declined at {{slink|Special:Permalink/1008160805#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by NomanPK44}}. Please remember that your topic ban covers all [[India]]-, [[Pakistan]]-, and [[Afghanistan]]-related topics, [[WP:TBAN|broadly construed]], and take care not to engage in any more [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]] violations (such as the edit in [[Special:Diff/1007087462]]) for the duration of the ban. Additionally, please review the [[WP:RS|reliable sources guideline]] and the [[WP:DR|guide to dispute resolution]], which outline some of the expectations for editing Wikipedia articles in controversial topic areas. — '''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 21:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:57, 21 February 2021
DS Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 20:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Covid19 sanctions
|topic=
not specified. Available options:
Doug Weller talk 17:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Hello, I'm Hammad. Your recent edit(s) to the page Muhammad Ali Mirza appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Hammad (Talk!) 02:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Eng Muhammad Ali Mirza
Hello, NomanPK44
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username AaqibAnjum and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Eng Muhammad Ali Mirza, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 11#Eng Muhammad Ali Mirza.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AaqibAnjum}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 02:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Muhammad Ali Mirza. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 13:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
@AaqibAnjum: I added his both youtube channels why you reverted it??NomanPK44 (talk) 13:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The later channel is not official. Thanks. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 13:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @AaqibAnjum: I guess you don't know much about him the second one is his official channel also where he uploads his full lectures. You can check on this channel https://www.youtube.com/user/EngineerMuhammadAliM that he have linked his other channel there.NomanPK44 (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- That doesn't make it official channel. It doesn't say so. I've checked it at your request. Please don't add it again. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @AaqibAnjum: You can check these videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frwSawhy4KY, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5pwBQYepV4&feature=youtu.be&t=175 in it he is telling about his channels please do some research atleast.NomanPK44 (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- That doesn't make it official channel. It doesn't say so. I've checked it at your request. Please don't add it again. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @AaqibAnjum: I guess you don't know much about him the second one is his official channel also where he uploads his full lectures. You can check on this channel https://www.youtube.com/user/EngineerMuhammadAliM that he have linked his other channel there.NomanPK44 (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Updating YouTube views
Dear Noman, when you update YouTube views on Muhammad Ali Mirza, please update the date in the infobox as well. Thanks - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 01:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- @AaqibAnjum: Sorry I forgot to add that. NomanPK44 (talk) 01:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Creffett isn't a checkuser. Cabayi (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also, as you filed the report you shouldn't have been the editor to close the discussion. And the atop summary is supposed to have your signature, not the timestamp of the block. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
A Barn star for you
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For effectively making the article Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 more neutral and impartial as well as for cleaning unnecessary information and putting it in the right place insteadسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ(talk) 09:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC) |
This User box might be helpful
Your user page states that you are a new user, you can type this in mark-up:{{this is a new user}} to create a Userbox which will look something like this:
Regards سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ(talk) 12:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
January 2021
Please stop your biased, politicaly motivated bullying. The content I have added on Insurgency in Northeast India is based on correct and original citations and references. William Raw (talk) 18:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by William Raw (talk • contribs)
- If you think that you have added the correct content then also add a reliable source. NomanPK44 (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Dhawangupta (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Partial block from Insurgency in Balochistan
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Balance_icon.svg/40px-Balance_icon.svg.png)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
El_C 18:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Indo-Pakistan War of 1965 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please gain consensus on the talk page before making major editsTemplate:Z186 Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Notice
This message is made for notifying you about a discussion on WP:ARE#NomanPK44 about your edits. Srijanx22 (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
The following topic ban now applies to you:
indefinitely topic banned from editing anything related to the WP:ARBIPA (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan) topic area, broadly construed
You have been sanctioned, per this AE complaint, including this almost-unbelievable revert regarding ThePrint (diff). Basically, you have proven to be a liability for this fraught topic area, so all of that stops now.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 15:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement action appeal
NomanPK44, your arbitration enforcement action appeal has been declined at Special:Permalink/1008160805 § Arbitration enforcement action appeal by NomanPK44. Please remember that your topic ban covers all India-, Pakistan-, and Afghanistan-related topics, broadly construed, and take care not to engage in any more topic ban violations (such as the edit in Special:Diff/1007087462) for the duration of the ban. Additionally, please review the reliable sources guideline and the guide to dispute resolution, which outline some of the expectations for editing Wikipedia articles in controversial topic areas. — Newslinger talk 21:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)