This file is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
There was a reason why I changed Image:Avatar Wii.JPG. It was too high resolution for a fair use claim, and it was watermarked. Please don't revert it again, as high-res fair use images are eligible for deletion. --Pekaje 16:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Template:Non-free media rationale
^ Images must generally be of low resolution. The rule of thumb for raster images is no more than 300 pixels in width or height, which ensures that the image's resolution is less than 0.1 megapixels. If you are using an image of higher resolution, please explain why.
it's okay to have a big pic.Just-fix-it 17:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, actually it is not. Particularly game covers are a tricky subject, since people might use it for cover art for pirated games. The covers are available elsewhere, sure, but we don't want Wikipedia to be a piracy enabler (even in this small way). So the image should be sufficiently low-res to make it look crummy on printout. 256px wide seems to satisfy that criteria nicely. Besides, when consensus is to do it this way, either do it this way or work to change consensus. --Pekaje 18:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]