- The guideline in question (not a rule) is "no use of the rollback feature on non-vandalism"; it's not much respected in actual practice.
- It's true that mav's been pressing his point quite vigorously; I share his opinion about the original protection by 168, but I believe the discussion has reached a point beyond which there is nothing to be gained by arguing. I feel I understand 168's viewpoint on his actions; I just don't agree. I guess mav, unlike me, doesn't think that the point of diminishing returns has been reached, and that's his privilege. In any case, it seems to me that 168 is giving as good as he's getting on his own RfC page.
- I do not require other sysops to consult with me before acting in whatever manner they feel is appropriate. I trust them to undertake due diligence.
- -- Cyan 21:06, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)