Neutrality (talk | contribs) Please do not remove the "Births by year" and "death by year" tags. |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Having said that, I did a bit more research, was surprised by the Alexa rank of the site ([http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.genmay.com/ 23,675]), and, given that the earlier discussion was obviously coloured by the content (all the trolling and vandalism going on at that time), which it shouldn't have been, I will not re-delete the article. —[[User:Stormie|Stormie]] 22:05, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC) |
Having said that, I did a bit more research, was surprised by the Alexa rank of the site ([http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.genmay.com/ 23,675]), and, given that the earlier discussion was obviously coloured by the content (all the trolling and vandalism going on at that time), which it shouldn't have been, I will not re-delete the article. —[[User:Stormie|Stormie]] 22:05, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC) |
||
== Please do not remove the "Births by year" and "death by year" tags. == |
|||
CfD guildlines clearly read: "Do not depopulate/remove the category tags from articles before the community has made a decision." Thanks. [[User:Neutrality|[[User:Neutrality|<b>Neutrality</b>]] ([[User talk:Neutrality|talk]])]] 18:18, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:21, 12 September 2004
Other Wiki's - simple
Previous items moved to:
Statement
Looks like it might be time for a break.
I've been basically strong-armed in the space of one day by three administrators over a concept I created and nursed. Three people feel that every editor who has used the Biography template are wrong, and have "taken it over", rather than discuss or create their own version. At every turn, I am, as a normal editor, at an editorial disadvantage to all sysops. I felt, up until recently, that anyone's contributions to this great project were equal. I've have found my hopes dashed at the reality. -- Netoholic @ |
General Mayhem
Well, you might not see this if you're taking a break, but: it's not a matter of content. The VFD discussion decided that Wikipedia does not need or want an article on this message board, regardless of content.
Having said that, I did a bit more research, was surprised by the Alexa rank of the site (23,675), and, given that the earlier discussion was obviously coloured by the content (all the trolling and vandalism going on at that time), which it shouldn't have been, I will not re-delete the article. —Stormie 22:05, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)