Slrubenstein (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
label |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
You are wrong. One can criticize things that people say, and things that people do, but to criticize a whole people is racist. You also seem to be wilfully misunderstanding my point. The link that I and others have been deleting is blatantly anti-semitic. [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]] |
You are wrong. One can criticize things that people say, and things that people do, but to criticize a whole people is racist. You also seem to be wilfully misunderstanding my point. The link that I and others have been deleting is blatantly anti-semitic. [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]] |
||
:Will it be acceptable if it is labelled as anti-semitic? Sam and Paul, would you accept this label if they keep the link? - [[User:Texture|Tεx]][[User Talk:Texture|<font color=red>τ</font>]][[User:Texture|urε]] 16:37, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:37, 15 April 2004
Older discussions may be found here:
Talk:Judaism Archive
Talk:Judaism/Archive 2
Talk:Judaism/Archive 3
Talk:Judaism/Archive 4
Criticism
- Home Page of "Jew Watch" The "anti-Jewish" critics of past and of current "Jewish/Zionist" Supremacism ]
- Judaism and Jewish Apologetics - Critical analysis of the moral aspects of parts of Judaism; from Infidels.Org
- Piety and Power: The World of Jewish Fundamentalism David Landau, Hill and Wang, 1993
- David Duke's critical historical analysis of "Jewish Supremacy" and its impact on the modern world
- http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0745308198/102-2015385-6701711?v=glance Jewish History Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years]
Editorial Reviews From Booklist: Israel Shahak, who came to Israel in 1945 after surviving the concentration camp in Belsen during the Holocaust, contends that the potential for Israel's right-wing Jewish religious movements to seize power represents a threat to the peace of Israel and to the Zionist movement. He posits that Israel as a Jewish state constitutes a danger not only to itself and its inhabitants, but to all Jews and to all other people and states in the Middle East. Shahak, who was raised as an Orthodox Jew, condemns what he sees as discrimination against non-Jewish citizens of Israel. The real test facing both Israeli and diaspora Jews is the test of their self-criticism, which must include the critique of the Jewish past. Most disturbing, Shahak insists that the religion, in its classical and talmudic form, is "poisoning minds and hearts."
This controversial attack of Israel by a Jew is bound to alarm Jewry worldwide. George Cohen --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
First, let's put away the red-herring of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. I am not taking any stand on this position here, nor does the article. It is appropriate for another article. Anyone who brings it up is clouding the issues here. If you are doing so and do not understand why it is unproductive I will explain it to yo; if you are deliberately clouding the issues know that you are using an anti-Semitic tactic. Second, that a website has the highest googles must -- as with all facts -- be taken in context. Anti-Semites link and search certain pages specifically to influence their position in Google. So, finally, the link in question is anti-semitic and has no place in this article. Period. If you feel wikipedians should have access to it, link it to the page on anti-semitism. Slrubenstein
- What makes you think that the judaism article is unique in being able to remain w/o criticism? You point about palistinians and such is valid. Your second point is flat out wrong, period. Sam Spade 05:06, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
You are wrong. One can criticize things that people say, and things that people do, but to criticize a whole people is racist. You also seem to be wilfully misunderstanding my point. The link that I and others have been deleting is blatantly anti-semitic. Slrubenstein