Renamed user Sloane (talk | contribs) reverted mutilation of quotes, deleted unreliable sources (read WP:V - forum posts are very, very bad) |
Roberth Edberg (talk | contribs) Added the Sequel II part again. Discussion page, please! |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
===Part IV=== |
===Part IV=== |
||
Part IV suggests the primary reason for the "corrupt" behavior humans use is linked to a collective ignorance of "the symbiotic and emergent aspects of natural law." The film suggests actions for "social transformation", some of which include [[boycott]]s of the large [[bank]]s that make up the [[Federal Reserve System]], the [[mainstream media]], the [[military]], and [[energy]] companies. It is also suggested that people reject the political structure. |
Part IV suggests the primary reason for the "corrupt" behavior humans use is linked to a collective ignorance of "the symbiotic and emergent aspects of natural law." The film suggests actions for "social transformation", some of which include [[boycott]]s of the large [[bank]]s that make up the [[Federal Reserve System]], the [[mainstream media]], the [[military]], and [[energy]] companies. It is also suggested that people reject the political structure. |
||
==Sequel II: 'Zeitgeist: Tabula Rasa' == |
|||
A second sequel, ''Zeitgeist III'', has been announced at the film's official homepage to be released in October 2010. The director has provided the working title for the film, "[[Tabula Rasa]]," and it tackles the "myth of human nature" |
|||
<ref>[http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?redirected&option=com_kunena&Itemid=3&func=view&catid=7&id=44197 Peter's announcement] trough an forum post by the Zeitgeist Movement Forum Administrator</ref>. |
|||
==Criticism== |
==Criticism== |
Revision as of 20:18, 26 February 2009
Zeitgeist, the Movie | |
---|---|
Written by | Peter Joseph |
Produced by | Peter Joseph[1] |
Distributed by | GMP LLC[2] |
Release date | 2007 |
Running time | 122 min |
Language | English (Available in 23 subtitles) |
Zeitgeist, the Movie is a 2007 documentary film released online for free and on DVD, presenting Christianity, the attacks of 9/11, and the US Federal Reserve Bank as being instrumental for social control and world domination.
Release
Zeitgeist was released online for free on Google video[3] on June 26, 2007 and has since been translated into several languages. For a time it reached the top of the chart of "most viewed" videos available through Google video.[4] A remastered version of Zeitgeist was screened on November 10, 2007 at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood as part of a film festival held there (the 4th Annual "Artivist Film Festival," where it won the award in the "Artivist Spirit" category for feature-length documentaries).[5][6] Few film critics have reviewed Zeitgeist, and those that have, have generally been dismissive (see the Criticism section).[7][8]
Synopsis
The film starts with a speech by Chögyam Trungpa about spirituality, followed by a series of musically synchronized clips of war and explosions culminating with one of the towers of World Trade Center collapsing during 9/11. Then there follows a sequence of clips showing the horrors of war. There is a short clip that shows a hand writing "1 + 1 = 2", but is brushed away by another hand before the first finishes, and is replaced by a bible and an American flag. After a few more war clips, the film then quotes Jordan Maxwell's Inner World of the Occult, criticizing religious institutions, governments, and the banking cartels who "have misled [the people] away from the true and divine presence in the universe." This portion ends with more images accompanied by audio of a portion of a George Carlin monologue on religion.
Part I
Part I, entitled "The Greatest Story Ever Sold" questions religions as original god-given stories, arguing the Christian religion specifically is mainly derived from other religions, astronomical facts, astrological myths and traditions; in turn derived from or sharing elements with other ones. In furtherance of the Jesus myth hypothesis, this part argues that the historical Jesus is a literary and astrological hybrid, nurtured politically in the interest of control.
Horus, the Egyptian Sun God, is introduced as having a number of attributes similar to many other religious deities which came after him, including but not limited to Attis, Krishna, Dionysus, Mithra and Jesus Christ; these attributes including virgin birth on December 25th, 12 disciples, burial for 3 days, resurrection, and performing of miracles.[9]
The film offers explanations for some of these common attributes. To explain the origin of the December 25 birth, the film points out that the Winter solstice has the shortest day, and therefore, the shortest amount of sunlight, of the year, and that about three days after it, sunlight time could be seen growing, thus marking the birth of a "God of light" or Sun God. Another Christian-astrological similarity, according to the film, is that the three stars in Orion's belt (called the "Three Kings") align with Sirius on December 25, the brightest star in the sky, and point to the Sun's rise on the horizon. This is equated to the Nativity of Jesus, where, according to the film, three "kings" follow the star in the east to locate the birth of Jesus. Furthermore, around December 25, Sun rises in the vicinity of Virgo, the constellation known as Virgin, which refers to the origin of Jesus' virgin birth. Comparison of sunset in the vicinity of Crux and Jesus' death on the cross is based on similar principle. In addition, parallels as walking on water (reflection at dawn/dusk) and turning water into wine (ripening of grapes) are shown as metaphoric miracles, explained as the influence of the Sun.
Christianity is then said to be a Gnostic myth, historized by the Roman Empire for social control of Europe through doctrines established at the First Council of Nicea. The Dark Ages, the Inquisitions and the Crusades are given as events which maintained Europe's submission to The Vatican through Christianity. The following is said in conclusion: "Christianity, along with all other theistic belief systems [...] empowers those who know the truth, but use the myth to manipulate and control societies. [...] It reduces human responsibility to the effect that "God" controls everything, and in turn awful crimes can be justified in the name of Divine Pursuit. [...] The religious myth is the most powerful device ever created, and serves as the psychological soil upon which other myths can flourish."
Part II
Part II, entitled "All the World's a Stage," portrays the events of September 11th as either orchestrated or allowed to happen by criminal elements within the United States government in order to generate mass fear, initiate and justify the War on Terror, provide a pretext for the curtailment of civil liberties, and produce economic gain. According to the film, the U.S. government had advance knowledge about the September 11, 2001 attacks, the response of the military deliberately let the planes reach their targets, and the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7 underwent a controlled demolition. The film claims that six of the named hijackers are still alive, that Hani Hanjour could not have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon, that no substantial plane wreckage was found at two of the three crash sites, that the Bush administration covered up the truth in the 9/11 Commission Report, and that the mainstream media have failed to ask important questions about the official account.
Part III
Part III, entitled "Don't Mind the Men Behind the Curtain",[10] argues that the three main wars of the United States during the 20th century were waged purely for economic gain for an elite few. Events that the film alleges to be fraudulent or staged are the sinking of the RMS Lusitania, the Attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Gulf of Tonkin Incident; all occurrences which carried the U.S into the First World War, Second World War and Vietnam War respectively.
According to the film, the U.S. was forced by the Federal Reserve Bank to become embroiled in these wars not to win but to sustain conflict, as it forces its government to borrow more money from the bank, with interest attached, thereby increasing the nation's debt and the profits of those who own The Fed. The film gives a history of the Reserve, claiming it engineered the Great Depression to steal wealth from the American population and was responsible for the attempts to assassinate Louis McFadden, a congressman who attempted to impeach the Reserve.
This section also explores the possibility that there is a clandestine movement, promoted by the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, to usurp the American constitution and US dollar, by merging the United States, Canada and Mexico into a North American Union that uses a single currency, the Amero, without the ratification of Congress. This currency union would create a super-state similar to the European Union, which together with the African Union and the proposed Asian Union would gradually be merged into a One World government. The movie concludes that under such a government, every human could be implanted with an RFID microchip that would be used to monitor individuals and suppress dissent. The movie ends, however, on an optimistic note, expressing confidence in the possibility of overthrowing the unknown oppressive forces and the ultimate triumph of revolution through enlightenment.
Sequel I: 'Zeitgeist: Addendum'
Zeitgeist: Addendum premiered at the 5th Annual Artivist Film Festival in Los Angeles, California on October 2, 2008, winning their highest award. It was released free online on October 4, 2008.[11] Director Peter Joseph stated: "The failure of our world to resolve the issues of war, poverty, and corruption, rests within a gross ignorance about what guides human behavior to begin with. It addresses the true source of the instability in our society, while offering the only fundamental, long-term solution."[12]
Part I
Part I follows on from Part III from the original film, citing the specific process of fractional-reserve banking as detailed in Modern Money Mechanics, released by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. In detailing the process of money creation, the film suggests society is manipulated into economic slavery through debt-based monetary policies by requiring individuals to submit for employment in order to pay off their debt, and it suggests that money itself is debt.
Part II
Part II is a documentary-style interview with The New York Times best-selling author and activist John Perkins based on his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, in which he describes his role as a self-described economic hit man. In that capacity, he claims to have helped the CIA, as well as various corporate and political entities, to undermine or corrupt foreign regimes that put the interests of their populations before those of the transnational corporations. In the film, Perkins denies the existence of a "conspiracy." Instead, he carefully discusses the role of corporatocracy.
Part III
Part III is a documentary-style interview with futurist Jacque Fresco. The film suggests Jacque Fresco's proposal of a "resource-based economy" through intelligent management of resources is a sustainable way for humanity to progress, and it would eliminate the scarcity of resources. He goes on to discuss technology as the primary driver of human advancement while politics is irrelevant because politicians are not trained to solve problems. Jacque Fresco claims that his approach is not the ultimate solution, but that "it's just much better than what we have. We can never achieve perfection."
Part IV
Part IV suggests the primary reason for the "corrupt" behavior humans use is linked to a collective ignorance of "the symbiotic and emergent aspects of natural law." The film suggests actions for "social transformation", some of which include boycotts of the large banks that make up the Federal Reserve System, the mainstream media, the military, and energy companies. It is also suggested that people reject the political structure.
Sequel II: 'Zeitgeist: Tabula Rasa'
A second sequel, Zeitgeist III, has been announced at the film's official homepage to be released in October 2010. The director has provided the working title for the film, "Tabula Rasa," and it tackles the "myth of human nature" [13].
Criticism
Zeitgeist has been ignored by the media, with a few exceptions. References to it in the media are dismissive:
An article in the Irish Times, [7] said that
"These are surreal perversions of genuine issues and debates, and they tarnish all criticism of faith, the Bush administration and globalisation - there are more than enough factual injustices in this world to be going around without having to invent fictional ones. One really wishes Zeitgeist was a masterful pastiche of 21st-century paranoia, a hilarious mockumentary to rival Spinal Tap. But it's just deluded, disingenuous and manipulative nonsense. [...] If you pretend to know only truth, in truth you know only pretence."
An article in the weekly Seattle paper The Stranger,[14] later reprinted in the Utne Reader magazine, [15] said:
"It's fiction, couched in a few facts [...] and it adds up to the worst kind of fear-mongering."
It also commented on the irony in the film's three-part structure by noting that
"It's fascinating, this structure. First the film destroys the idea of God, and then, through the lens of 9/11, it introduces a sort of new Bizarro God. Instead of an omnipotent, omniscient being who loves you and has inspired a variety of organized religions, there is an omnipotent, omniscient organization of ruthless beings who hate you and want to take your rights away, if not throw you in a work camp forever."
The February 25, 2009 edition of eSkeptic,[16] the online newsletter of The Skeptics Society, criticizes the first part of the film by saying:
"Part I of Peter Joseph’s Internet film, Zeitgeist, is that some of what it asserts is true. Unfortunately, this material is liberally — and sloppily — mixed with material that is only partially true and much that is plainly and simply bogus."
The Globe and Mail [8] has also published a critical article about the movie, titled "Rejecting Conspiracy Thinking Keeps it Alive and Well," in which it is said that
"[...] this stuff [...] it's all been thoroughly debunked for years. Evidently, debunking isn't the issue. [...] Nor can you cite the findings of the professional, journalistic, and academic consensus to someone who's decided that having credibility means being under the sway of shadowy forces. [...] for all the talk of skepticism, conspiracy counterculture is really an anti-intellectual, populist movement - much like Intelligent Design. For all their absurdity, conspiracy theorists try to drag everything back to the level of common sense. [...] Did the collapsing buildings on 9/11 look like they were being demolished? Then they must have been demolished. Did the 757 that hit the Pentagon's blast-proof walls fail to make a plane-shaped hole? Then it must have been something else. Are there unexplained quirks in the official story? Then it must be the work of a higher power. [...] Conspiracy theorists want to see [...] a malevolent design behind events.
The notion that calamity might be the unintended consequence of subtler causes doesn't hold the same appeal. Evil, whatever its other uses, drives a great narrative. Complexity, not so much."
The Village Voice [17] mentioned Zeitgeist in passing in a review of the 2008 fiction film Able Danger in which the film critic sees an
"invocation of September 11 for the vaguely satirical purpose of tweaking conspiracy crap like that found in Zeitgeist: The Movie (an Internet film that, like Krik's recent "Be Kanye" ads, went mega-viral last year)"
CBC Radio [18] Host Jesse Brown broadcast an audio essay on the movie summarizing the movie with:
"caution: tin foil hat area"
See also
- Bible conspiracy theory
- 9/11 conspiracy theories
- False flag
- Fractional reserve banking
- Jesus myth hypothesis
- Jesus Christ in comparative mythology
- The God Who Wasn't There
- Loose Change (film)
References
- ^ IMDb Profile
- ^ IMDB company credits
- ^ Google Video Zeitgeist, The Movie (Official Release - Full Film)
- ^ Google video
- ^ "4th Annual Artivist Film Festival & Artivist Awards". Artivist Film Festival and Artivist Awards press release. October 31, 2007. Retrieved February 10, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
and|date=
(help) - ^ "4th Annual Artivist Film Festival and Artivist Awards Announce the Winning Films of This Year's Festival". Artivist Film Festival and Artivist Award press release. November 5, 2007. Retrieved February 10, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
and|date=
(help) - ^ a b Davin O'Dwyer (August 25, 2007). "Zeitgeist: the nonsense". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on August 26, 2007. Retrieved February 10, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
,|date=
, and|archivedate=
(help) - ^ a b Ivor Tossel (August 20, 2007). "Rejecting conspiracy thinking keeps it alive and well". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved February 10, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
and|date=
(help) - ^ Official Zeitgeist Website [1]
- ^ a quote from the 1939 film The Wizard of Oz
- ^ The Wall Street Journal Digital Network's Market Watch, Press release.
- ^ Breaking News, Artivist Film Festival website.
- ^ Peter's announcement trough an forum post by the Zeitgeist Movement Forum Administrator
- ^ Paul Constant (September 5, 2007). "Beauty Is Truth". The Stranger. Retrieved February 10, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
and|date=
(help) - ^ Paul Constant (January 1, 2008). "Towers of Babble". Utne Reader. Retrieved February 10, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
and|date=
(help) - ^ http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-02-25.html
- ^ Orange, Michelle. (September 10, 2008) The Village Voice Able Danger
- ^ Jesse's Essay - Zeitgeist: The Movie on CBC Radio One[2]