Content deleted Content added
Adam Cuerden (talk | contribs) →Discuss this story: Reply Tag: Reply |
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) comment |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It is. There shall no doubt be a lot more after the decision's published, since right now it'd have to be a carefully unbiasd summary of a lot of competing viewpoints. Considered whether this should be rolled into one of the other sections, didn't see an obvious target, and, well.... <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 8.3% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]. Currently celebrating his [[:File:Elliott & Fry - photograph W. S. Gilbert.jpg|600<sup>th</sup> FP]]!</sub></span> 06:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC) |
:It is. There shall no doubt be a lot more after the decision's published, since right now it'd have to be a carefully unbiasd summary of a lot of competing viewpoints. Considered whether this should be rolled into one of the other sections, didn't see an obvious target, and, well.... <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 8.3% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]. Currently celebrating his [[:File:Elliott & Fry - photograph W. S. Gilbert.jpg|600<sup>th</sup> FP]]!</sub></span> 06:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
I think it was a very sensible editorial judgment to wait to cover the ArbCom decision until after it is issued, or at least is proposed. However, the references above to Wikipediocracy and BLPCRIME were probably not worth specific mention here; at least in my perception, these items are of very minor, if any, significance to the case as a whole. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 16:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:17, 8 May 2023
Discuss this story
This is shockingly short. Frostly (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is. There shall no doubt be a lot more after the decision's published, since right now it'd have to be a carefully unbiasd summary of a lot of competing viewpoints. Considered whether this should be rolled into one of the other sections, didn't see an obvious target, and, well.... Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 06:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I think it was a very sensible editorial judgment to wait to cover the ArbCom decision until after it is issued, or at least is proposed. However, the references above to Wikipediocracy and BLPCRIME were probably not worth specific mention here; at least in my perception, these items are of very minor, if any, significance to the case as a whole. Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)