link to old notice board archive |
AndrewPeterT (talk | contribs) →RfC of interest: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
== Requested move at [[Talk:Sparebank#Requested move 5 October 2023]] == |
== Requested move at [[Talk:Sparebank#Requested move 5 October 2023]] == |
||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Sparebank#Requested move 5 October 2023]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:ModernDayTrilobite|ModernDayTrilobite]] ([[User talk:ModernDayTrilobite|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ModernDayTrilobite|contribs]]) 14:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Sparebank#Requested move 5 October 2023]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:ModernDayTrilobite|ModernDayTrilobite]] ([[User talk:ModernDayTrilobite|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ModernDayTrilobite|contribs]]) 14:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
== RfC of interest == |
|||
<small>(non-automated message)</small> Greetings to all members of WP:NORWAY! I have opened an RfC on [[WT:ROYALTY]] that may be of interest to users of this WikiProject! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility#RfC: How should articles on sovereigns of current European monarchies be (re)titled?|here]]! '''''[[User:AndrewPeterT|Hurricane]] [[User talk:AndrewPeterT|Andrew]] ([[Special:Contributions/AndrewPeterT|444]])''''' 22:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:59, 23 November 2023
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
1, 2, 3, 4 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
The order of the monuments is not well understood and, so as not to risk making a mistake, I don't intend to change the order of the monuments (for information: I left the order unchanged; I only corrected the wikilinks and explained the order better, but it is the same order: Oslo. JackkBrown (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Lists of municipalities
We have List of municipalities of Norway and List of municipality numbers of Norway, which would seem to be ripe for merging, but apparently not, per this discussion. Can the latter page be merged into List of former municipalities of Norway instead? Something really should be done. The current situation is… suboptimal. - dcljr (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking, it can't be merged into List of municipalities of Norway because it contains historical municipalities, and it can't be merged into List of former municipalities of Norway because it contains non-historical municipalities (although not all). It could be split into a list of current municipality numbers and a list of historical municipality numbers, and then have each of those merges into respective list of municipalities, but that would be suboptimal if you don't know if the number you want to look up is historical or not.
- What exactly is the problem with List of municipality numbers of Norway? The fact that it is not updated? That people end up there instead of List of municipalities of Norway when wanting to look up numbers that are definitely current and therefore having to dig through a bigger list? (At the moment, people are more likely to have historical numbers as numbers are being changed quite frequently.) Something else? It is not like Wikipedia has no room. Ters (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- At the very least, the list should be updated, which someone tried to do last year and got reverted. See Talk:List of municipality numbers of Norway#Why not updated?, which I just created, and comment there, if you wish. - dcljr (talk) 01:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- The list should not be updated, because it is a valuable tool for historical research in Norway. I have proposed a renaming to eg. "List of municipality numbers of Norway (1837–2017)" and then anyone should be welcome to keep another updated and regularly maintained list of current municipalities. But please let us keep the list as it is. The 1947 division is the "gold standard" for historical purposes.
- 13:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC) leifbk (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- At the very least, the list should be updated, which someone tried to do last year and got reverted. See Talk:List of municipality numbers of Norway#Why not updated?, which I just created, and comment there, if you wish. - dcljr (talk) 01:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Reassessment
Hi, may I get reassessment/feedback on the articles Eurohound and Greyster? Thank you! Annwfwn (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
10 year old referencing error needs attention. Thanks Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- What is the error? - dcljr (talk) 00:27, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- There are two references to Norwegian Public Roads Administration 1989, currently numbers 40 (p.48) and 43 (p.49). However there is no citation corresponding to these references. There are citations for Norwegian Public Roads Administration dated 2010, 2009 and 2006 but nothing for 1989. I can't speak Norwegian, so there is no point in me chasing them up, I hope that someone in Project Norway can however. Thanks, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- so the links are dead? cant you just like link an archive from the wayback machine? Sebbog13 (talk) 14:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- It's not so much an error as an inadequate citation. It's given in "Harvard style", with no URL or title, only the name of the organization and year. (I suppose it's possible this info exists in a previous revision of the article — I haven't checked.) As Martin alluded to, there are links to resources from the same agency for other years, all of which are at their website, vegvesen.no (a live link to which can be found in the article Norwegian Public Roads Administration). Presumably this requires someone who knows Norwegian to search that website for the information in the article that is cited with this reference (currently refs 40 and 43). - dcljr (talk) 03:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- so the links are dead? cant you just like link an archive from the wayback machine? Sebbog13 (talk) 14:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- There are two references to Norwegian Public Roads Administration 1989, currently numbers 40 (p.48) and 43 (p.49). However there is no citation corresponding to these references. There are citations for Norwegian Public Roads Administration dated 2010, 2009 and 2006 but nothing for 1989. I can't speak Norwegian, so there is no point in me chasing them up, I hope that someone in Project Norway can however. Thanks, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
how do i join this wikiproject?
how do i join? Sebbog13 (talk) 22:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway#Active members. (But it might be a little easier to work with the subpage Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway/Members.) - dcljr (talk) 03:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:NO!" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Wikipedia:NO! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 4 § Wikipedia:NO! until a consensus is reached. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 03:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
I’d like help researching for an article I plan to create
Ghost fliers
Documented "flap" (wave) of UFO sightings across Scandinavia in the 1930s. Not even mentioned at List of reported UFO sightings, but even the NYT covered it briefly in 1934 (paywalled archive). Finnish WP page at fi:Kummituslentokoneet.
Help finding Norwegian-language sources would be much appreciated. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 07:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
Hello WikiProject Norway:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Good article reassessment for Bergen Light Rail
Bergen Light Rail has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GeorgR (de) (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Sparebank#Requested move 5 October 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sparebank#Requested move 5 October 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
RfC of interest
(non-automated message) Greetings to all members of WP:NORWAY! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users of this WikiProject! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew (444) 22:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)