PrincessofLlyr (talk | contribs) →Editnotice: note |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
I requested a review several days ago, and I have ''still'' not been reviewed. Why? [[User:Immunize|Immunize ]] ([[User talk:Immunize|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC) |
I requested a review several days ago, and I have ''still'' not been reviewed. Why? [[User:Immunize|Immunize ]] ([[User talk:Immunize|talk]]) 14:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
* Like all of Wikipedia, the reviewers here are volunteers. You have waited 3 days - in the past, there used to be waits of up to 4 weeks! Recently, the average length of wait for a review has been about 8 days - please be patient and you ''will'' be reviewed. For example, I have reviewed people in the past, but over the last month or so, I have not done any - not because I don't want to, but because other real-life commitments, or Wikipedia commitments have prevented me! Also, remember that you can do reviews of others yourself - for example, {{u|ComputerGuy}} has been waiting since 8th May (4 times as long as you have waited) - perhaps you could do a review of them? I hope to get to do a couple of reviews later this week (including you, hopefully) - but a review takes me anything from 1/2 hour up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, whether they want RfA-type feedback, etc - it's not something which can be done in a couple of minutes if you are going to do it properly! -- '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 20:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC) |
* Like all of Wikipedia, the reviewers here are volunteers. You have waited 3 days - in the past, there used to be waits of up to 4 weeks! Recently, the average length of wait for a review has been about 8 days - please be patient and you ''will'' be reviewed. For example, I have reviewed people in the past, but over the last month or so, I have not done any - not because I don't want to, but because other real-life commitments, or Wikipedia commitments have prevented me! Also, remember that you can do reviews of others yourself - for example, {{u|ComputerGuy}} has been waiting since 8th May (4 times as long as you have waited) - perhaps you could do a review of them? I hope to get to do a couple of reviews later this week (including you, hopefully) - but a review takes me anything from 1/2 hour up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, whether they want RfA-type feedback, etc - it's not something which can be done in a couple of minutes if you are going to do it properly! -- '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 20:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:I might get around to doing a review here at some later point, but at this time I am busy with real life ''and'' vandalism patrol. Note that I have still not been reviewed. Regards. [[User:Immunize|Immunize ]] ([[User talk:Immunize|talk]]) 22:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Editnotice == |
== Editnotice == |
Revision as of 22:53, 3 June 2010
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
A big thank you...
To Ginsengbomb, for the reviews you have done today! Along with everyone else, it means that all requests apart from the ones added during the last couple of days have at least one review! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Review not showing up?
I created a review page for myself a few days ago, but it's not showing up on the main page. Did I do something wrong or am I just missing something? PrincessofLlyr (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- You forgot to transclude it. I have now done this, so that it shows up! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 00:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Why have I not been reviewed yet?
I requested a review several days ago, and I have still not been reviewed. Why? Immunize (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Like all of Wikipedia, the reviewers here are volunteers. You have waited 3 days - in the past, there used to be waits of up to 4 weeks! Recently, the average length of wait for a review has been about 8 days - please be patient and you will be reviewed. For example, I have reviewed people in the past, but over the last month or so, I have not done any - not because I don't want to, but because other real-life commitments, or Wikipedia commitments have prevented me! Also, remember that you can do reviews of others yourself - for example, ComputerGuy has been waiting since 8th May (4 times as long as you have waited) - perhaps you could do a review of them? I hope to get to do a couple of reviews later this week (including you, hopefully) - but a review takes me anything from 1/2 hour up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, whether they want RfA-type feedback, etc - it's not something which can be done in a couple of minutes if you are going to do it properly! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- I might get around to doing a review here at some later point, but at this time I am busy with real life and vandalism patrol. Note that I have still not been reviewed. Regards. Immunize (talk) 22:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Editnotice
What is the URL of the editnotice (the one you get when you request a review)? I want to touch up a link but I can't seem to get to the editnotice's page to do so... (If you have the time can you tell me on my talkpage? Its easier for me that way, my watchlist is massive...)
Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 08:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- replied on talk page as requested. PrincessofLlyr royal court 22:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)