Change in voting for Finding of Fact on Mathsci
This finding did not pass when the deadline appeared, oversight of Courcelles or not. If it had been likely to pass, given the evidence provided, I would have insisted that it be rephrased, to remove the statements about personal attacks and ideological stance. The evidence of Ferahgo the Assassin and Captain Occam shows neither a pattern of personal attacks (which diffs?) nor any ideological stance that I supposedly have (which diffs?). My understanding is that the diffs they gathered were a catalogue of the times that I had mentioned either Captain Occam or Ferahgo the Assassin on wikipedia: for example on the AE2011 election page of Jclemens, where I responded to a question of Casliber, and on the workshop page of the abortion arbcom case. It is true that the finding echos what Captain Occam stated on wikipedia on User talk:Ludwigs2 [1][2] and similar statements posted by the pair on external websites. All of these were extreme and unbalanced statements, both on-wiki and off-wiki. The statements on User talk:Ludwigs2 are classic example of personal attacks. Nothing I have written on wikipedia comes even vaguely close to that. Mathsci (talk) 07:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)