Andersmusician (talk | contribs) →New article propossal: comment |
→Eudaimonia and eudaimonism: new section |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:I think you may be looking for our article on [[analytic philosophy]]. Regards, <font color="404040">[[User talk:Skomorokh|<font face="Garamond" color="black">the skomorokh</font>]]</font> 06:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC) |
:I think you may be looking for our article on [[analytic philosophy]]. Regards, <font color="404040">[[User talk:Skomorokh|<font face="Garamond" color="black">the skomorokh</font>]]</font> 06:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
::thanks a lot, time to read for me --'''''[[User:Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="green">Andersmusician</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="red">NO</font>]]''''' 21:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC) |
::thanks a lot, time to read for me --'''''[[User:Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="green">Andersmusician</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="red">NO</font>]]''''' 21:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Eudaimonia and eudaimonism == |
|||
I've placed merge tags on [[eudaimonia]] and [[eudaimonism]] but I'm not entirely sure how to proceed. Could an expert take a look at both of these articles and determine the best course of action? FWIW, eudaimonia was the original article, created in Feb. 2003. [[Eudaimonism]] was created a year later, in Jan. 2004. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:03, 30 November 2008
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Announcements
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Stereotypes page
Can someone help me? There is a huge white stereotypes section and only a few meager sections for nonwhites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YVNP (talk • contribs) 01:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Task force proposal
Would anyone be interested in creating a task force from this project which focuses on 19th century American Transcendentalism? --Midnightdreary (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Request for comment on Leonardo da Vinci article
A request for comment has been made at the Leonardo da Vinci article, which is supported by this WikiProject. The question for the RFC is "Does the praise in the lead section constitute peacock terminology?" Please visit Talk:Leonardo da Vinci#Request for comment on style of lead section if you would like to comment. Papa November (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Proposal to redirect Seth Material
There is a proposal to redirect Seth Material (an article within this Wikiproject's scope) to Jane Roberts. Please comment at Talk:Seth Material#Redirect to Jane Roberts. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
New article propossal
I want you to create a new article or somewhat of a list about Anglo-American Philosophy, which I believe tends to be a little different than Continental Philosophy (so I could give a better exam on contemporary philosophy next week). haha I mean it seriously, I need this --Andersmusician NO 06:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think you may be looking for our article on analytic philosophy. Regards, the skomorokh 06:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- thanks a lot, time to read for me --Andersmusician NO 21:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Eudaimonia and eudaimonism
I've placed merge tags on eudaimonia and eudaimonism but I'm not entirely sure how to proceed. Could an expert take a look at both of these articles and determine the best course of action? FWIW, eudaimonia was the original article, created in Feb. 2003. Eudaimonism was created a year later, in Jan. 2004. Viriditas (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)