Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment/Climate change task force/Archive 1) (bot |
→Climate change deniers are all gone: request participation at ExxonMobil |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Right wing wrong headed admin just decided to unilaterally deleted all climate change denialists. He needs to be reminded of the science. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/166.176.57.68|166.176.57.68]] ([[User talk:166.176.57.68|talk]]) 22:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Right wing wrong headed admin just decided to unilaterally deleted all climate change denialists. He needs to be reminded of the science. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/166.176.57.68|166.176.57.68]] ([[User talk:166.176.57.68|talk]]) 22:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== ExxonMobil == |
|||
This notice is a cross-post from the Environmental Record task force talk page. |
|||
From roughly 2009 until last week, our project's article [[ExxonMobil]] included a subtopic of several paragraphs entitled "Funding of climate change skepticism" in the "Environmental record" section. Last week, two of our colleagues teamed up to move the subtopic ''en mass'' to the "Criticisms" section, and re-heading it "Attitudes toward global warming." I've hatted the article for POV and re-assessed the article quality from B class to C because of this significant neutrality issue. Respectfully request additional eyes and additional participation of project members at [[ExxonMobil]]. Thank you. [[User:HughD|Hugh]] ([[User talk:HughD|talk]]) 16:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:19, 3 January 2016
Environment: Climate change Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
Expert feedback on climate change articles?
A group of climate change experts is interested in providing feedback on Wikipedia articles in this area by way of Hypothes.is, as explained here. Please comment there to keep the discussion in one place. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
New draft for the 10:10 article
Hi everyone! Following 16912 Rhiannon's example, I'm sharing a comprehensive draft update to the article on 10:10, the UK-based climate change campaign in the hope that it can aid the process of bringing the main article up to date. It's saved as a workspace draft here.
As a 10:10 employee, it didn't feel appropriate for me to edit the article directly, but as it hasn't had a significant update since 2013, I thought it'd be good to get the ball rolling.
The new draft includes sections on the more recent Back Balcombe and #itshappening campaigns run by 10:10, as well as past projects and an updated introduction reflecting the organisation's broader focus.
I'd be really grateful for any feedback on the draft as it currently stands, or if interested editors feel it's already good to go, please feel free to incorporate it into the live article as you see fit. Thanks! Simuove (talk) 16:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Archived old addressed threads
I've archived some old and/or addresssed threads.
Metric used was older than one (1) year, zero new activity, zero responses to posts, and notices to discussions like deletion discussions that were since closed, years ago.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Created new article on book - Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand
I've created a new article on the book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand.
Input and suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 06:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Climate change deniers are all gone
Right wing wrong headed admin just decided to unilaterally deleted all climate change denialists. He needs to be reminded of the science. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.176.57.68 (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
ExxonMobil
This notice is a cross-post from the Environmental Record task force talk page.
From roughly 2009 until last week, our project's article ExxonMobil included a subtopic of several paragraphs entitled "Funding of climate change skepticism" in the "Environmental record" section. Last week, two of our colleagues teamed up to move the subtopic en mass to the "Criticisms" section, and re-heading it "Attitudes toward global warming." I've hatted the article for POV and re-assessed the article quality from B class to C because of this significant neutrality issue. Respectfully request additional eyes and additional participation of project members at ExxonMobil. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)