→Workshop reopened for one week: Outgoing Committee's nice finish |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Because of the nature of this case and the importance of the exact wording of remedies, the Arbitration Committee would like to invite public comment and workshopping on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4/Proposed decision|proposed decision, which will be posted soon]]. Accordingly, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4/Workshop|workshop]] in this case is re-opened and will remain open until Friday, December 13. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 22:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
Because of the nature of this case and the importance of the exact wording of remedies, the Arbitration Committee would like to invite public comment and workshopping on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4/Proposed decision|proposed decision, which will be posted soon]]. Accordingly, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4/Workshop|workshop]] in this case is re-opened and will remain open until Friday, December 13. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 22:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
*The Committee has released its draft PD [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_4/Workshop#Proposals_by_Arbitration_Committee|here]]. Best, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 23:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
*The Committee has released its draft PD [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_4/Workshop#Proposals_by_Arbitration_Committee|here]]. Best, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 23:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
==Looking good!== |
|||
After a cursory glance at the proposed decision in the Workshop project page, I am pleased to learn that many key problems are resolved by the proposal. With refinement, this has the potential to make an important difference in checking ARBPIA-related disruption. To the point that we may not need an ARBPIA5, even. Well done! [[User:El_C|El_C]] 23:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:40, 6 December 2019
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
Workshop reopened for one week
Because of the nature of this case and the importance of the exact wording of remedies, the Arbitration Committee would like to invite public comment and workshopping on the proposed decision, which will be posted soon. Accordingly, the workshop in this case is re-opened and will remain open until Friday, December 13. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- The Committee has released its draft PD here. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Looking good!
After a cursory glance at the proposed decision in the Workshop project page, I am pleased to learn that many key problems are resolved by the proposal. With refinement, this has the potential to make an important difference in checking ARBPIA-related disruption. To the point that we may not need an ARBPIA5, even. Well done! El_C 23:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)