Content deleted Content added
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs) Per WP:TPG |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::: The first close is a bygone era. Check the second time you nominated and the result is there for you again. In short, what you want to happen [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT|has not happened]]. Get over it and stop being a snob. This is for you: [[WP:TROUT]]. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 17:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
::: The first close is a bygone era. Check the second time you nominated and the result is there for you again. In short, what you want to happen [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT|has not happened]]. Get over it and stop being a snob. This is for you: [[WP:TROUT]]. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 17:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
::::Yes it is there[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_June_6#Kashmir_separatist_movement] Closed as no consensus. So here we are again due to editors continually pushing POV material into the template which has no place there. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 17:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
::::Yes it is there[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_June_6#Kashmir_separatist_movement] Closed as no consensus. So here we are again due to editors continually pushing POV material into the template which has no place there. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 17:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. The problem is, Pakistan sees the Kashmir conflict as a separatism conflict in which [[Jammu and Kashmir]] (Indian-administered Kashmir) allegedly wants to separate itself from India with Pakistani help. Thus, some editors following the Pakistani pov created the [[Template:Kashmir separatist movement]] and put it on every Kashmir or India/Pakistan war-related article. India and editors here following the Indian point of view, however, see the Kashmir conflict as a conflict of attempted territorial conquest by Pakistan using terrorist means and forced eviction campaigns of Hindus from Kashmir. The template in question, exclusively representing Pakistan's pov, cannot possibly conciliate and represent properly both point of views. Therefore, the template should be deleted. The neutrally named [[Template:Kashmir conflict]] should be worked with and expanded instead. [[User:JCAla|JCAla]] ([[User talk:JCAla|talk]]) 17:25, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Pokeconvert]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Pokeconvert]] ==== |
Revision as of 17:25, 26 June 2012
June 26
Template:Kashmir separatist movement
- Template:Kashmir separatist movement (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Every time I remove the POV stuff which has nothing to do with seperatisim it is reverted back in. The template is unfix-able due to this behavior. I have made my points on the talk page, they are roundly ignored. The template remains and always will remain POV and needs to go. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep and close: this place is not to resolve content disputes, talkpage is (where no effort has been made about the current dispute). This nomination would violate WP:POINT and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT because it was kept on two subsequent nominations consecutively in a short period and that too recently. [1] [2]. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Earlier discussion were closed as no consensus as multiple editors had hoped that a discussion would improve the template. The template has been created to push a biased POV and any attempt to neutralize the POV has been reverted. --DBigXray 17:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This is the third time that this user has nominated this template for deletion, after two closes where the consensus was clear. (Personal attack removed) Mar4d (talk) 17:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Both were closed as no consensus actually, and the first closer said renominate if necessary. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- The first close is a bygone era. Check the second time you nominated and the result is there for you again. In short, what you want to happen has not happened. Get over it and stop being a snob. This is for you: WP:TROUT. Mar4d (talk) 17:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes it is there[3] Closed as no consensus. So here we are again due to editors continually pushing POV material into the template which has no place there. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- The first close is a bygone era. Check the second time you nominated and the result is there for you again. In short, what you want to happen has not happened. Get over it and stop being a snob. This is for you: WP:TROUT. Mar4d (talk) 17:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Both were closed as no consensus actually, and the first closer said renominate if necessary. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The problem is, Pakistan sees the Kashmir conflict as a separatism conflict in which Jammu and Kashmir (Indian-administered Kashmir) allegedly wants to separate itself from India with Pakistani help. Thus, some editors following the Pakistani pov created the Template:Kashmir separatist movement and put it on every Kashmir or India/Pakistan war-related article. India and editors here following the Indian point of view, however, see the Kashmir conflict as a conflict of attempted territorial conquest by Pakistan using terrorist means and forced eviction campaigns of Hindus from Kashmir. The template in question, exclusively representing Pakistan's pov, cannot possibly conciliate and represent properly both point of views. Therefore, the template should be deleted. The neutrally named Template:Kashmir conflict should be worked with and expanded instead. JCAla (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Template:Pokeconvert
- Template:Pokeconvert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused and I suspect a remnant of the days when there were a large number of Pokemon articles. Izno (talk) 03:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- keep this is a substitution template, not meant to be transcluded. It's meant to provide a complete reference for consistency. --ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 03:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- I would assume that's the truth, but I see no documentation that it is to be transcluded or used as a reference (hence the nom). On the other hand, is it really so necessary [now]? I'm sure there are external tools available for this sort of lookup. --Izno (talk) 04:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- delete, substituting this template would be your worst option. the parserfunctions would leave a mess. 24.206.47.98 (talk) 04:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)