Content deleted Content added
m →[[Template:Ugandan topics]]: addition |
m →[[Template:Ugandan topics]]: consensus |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==== [[Template:Ugandan topics]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Ugandan topics]] ==== |
||
:{{lt|Ugandan topics}} |
:{{lt|Ugandan topics}} |
||
[[:Category:Uganda|Uganda related topics]] are too numerous to warrant this template. What is the criteria for adding some articles, and omitting others? Importance? Who decides? Seems too subjective. — [[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 04:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
[[:Category:Uganda|Uganda related topics]] are too numerous to warrant this template. What is the criteria for adding some articles, and omitting others? Importance? Who decides? Seems too subjective. Just like the band and video game templates I've worked on we eventually come to a consensus on what should be put in there. — [[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 04:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I don't visit TfDs much, but since when was subjectivity a reason to delete a template I started? The categories it covers look fine to me. '''[<i></i>[[User_talk:Mac Davis|<font color="#006600" face="Times"><i>Mαc Δαvιs</i></font>]]<i></i>]''' <small>([[User_talk:Mac_Davis/Improvement|<font color="#666666">How's my driving?</font>]])</small> ❖ 04:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
:I don't visit TfDs much, but since when was subjectivity a reason to delete a template I started? The categories it covers look fine to me. '''[<i></i>[[User_talk:Mac Davis|<font color="#006600" face="Times"><i>Mαc Δαvιs</i></font>]]<i></i>]''' <small>([[User_talk:Mac_Davis/Improvement|<font color="#666666">How's my driving?</font>]])</small> ❖ 04:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Redundancy and subjectivity is reason enough. --[[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 04:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
::Redundancy and subjectivity is reason enough. --[[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 04:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:39, 28 March 2007
March 28
Template:NJDOT
- Template:NJDOT ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Not a free license. The New Jersey Department of Transportation permits copying, but not the creation or distribution of derivative works -- and they don't promise that anything is free of third-party copyright interests, either. —-Carnildo 00:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. At first glance, this does look valid, since creation or distribution of derivative works is not required by our policies. But the nom is right; it doesn't promise that there is no third-party copyright interest, just gives an assurance that the department itself allows free use. In fact, it explicitly states that there may be a copyright holder who will complain. -Amarkov moo! 04:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- There are two ways in which we can use an image under Wikipedia: fair use, which has some fairly strict restrictions on what qualifies, or free content, which does require derivative works. This license template doesn't fit either category. --Carnildo 07:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Template:Ugandan topics
- Template:Ugandan topics ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Uganda related topics are too numerous to warrant this template. What is the criteria for adding some articles, and omitting others? Importance? Who decides? Seems too subjective. Just like the band and video game templates I've worked on we eventually come to a consensus on what should be put in there. — Ezeu 04:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't visit TfDs much, but since when was subjectivity a reason to delete a template I started? The categories it covers look fine to me. [Mαc Δαvιs] (How's my driving?) ❖ 04:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Redundancy and subjectivity is reason enough. --Ezeu 04:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep per Template:Falkland Islands topics, Template:Brazil-related topics, Template:Gibraltar topics, Template:Libyan topics, Template:Sudan topics, etc. As with everything in Wikipedia, editors decide on content by consensus. I find the nominator's arguments completely lacking. — Reinyday, 17:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)