m Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info) |
→28 April 2019: close |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
i |
i |
||
===28 April 2019=== |
===28 April 2019=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Insufficient evidence. Closing.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 16:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 16:55, 28 April 2019
Renamed user 49274c4c204245204241434b
- Renamed user 49274c4c204245204241434b (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
i
28 April 2019
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- VballJohnny (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
The contributor once known as CommotioCerebri went into a rage, and started wikistalking me two years ago, when I mildly implied a contributor with less than a dozen edits under their belt might have something to learn from someone with over 100,000 edits. They have used over 75 different wiki-ID to continue wikistalking me, as can be seen in this page's archives, since their known named sockpuppets were indefinitely blocked.
Today they seem to have tried creating another named ID, in violation of their indefinite block. I reverted this edit, a typical unexplained reversion of a random edit I made, typical of this individual, a few days ago. Today VballJohnny repeated the disruptive edit 129.100.255.30 made.
The reason I am requesting a checkuser is that I've suspected that someone as easily triggered as this individual is very likely to have had their malice triggered by other contributors, and that they have been targetting those other individuals using other previously unknown sockpuppets. Geo Swan (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Insufficient evidence. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC)