Adrian J. Hunter (talk | contribs) →Comments by other users: misunderstanding? |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
This may be a simple mis-understanding caused by wiki-jargon – please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=407278484&oldid=407277732 this] comment from me at the helpdesk. That said, I understand there may be reasons behind Py0alb's reluctance to state what article he's referring to. I don't see any reason for a checkuser or whatever if s/he only edits at the helpdesk, though. [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian '''J.''' Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 14:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
I don't have a block, nor am I disputing a block. What I meant in the comment he is referring to was I was unable to re-edit a page because I am voluntarily obeying the three revert rule. |
I don't have a block, nor am I disputing a block. What I meant in the comment he is referring to was I was unable to re-edit a page because I am voluntarily obeying the three revert rule. |
Revision as of 14:55, 11 January 2011
Py0alb
- Py0alb (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
11 January 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Py0alb (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Comments at WP:HD indicate that the user is disputing their block, but has a clean block log; apparent block evasion. Apologies if this is the wrong venue since it's more block evasion rather than sockpuppetry, since the user seems to have made it clear they have another account (though doesn't appear willing to identify the account). GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 14:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This may be a simple mis-understanding caused by wiki-jargon – please see this comment from me at the helpdesk. That said, I understand there may be reasons behind Py0alb's reluctance to state what article he's referring to. I don't see any reason for a checkuser or whatever if s/he only edits at the helpdesk, though. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 14:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
I don't have a block, nor am I disputing a block. What I meant in the comment he is referring to was I was unable to re-edit a page because I am voluntarily obeying the three revert rule.
Neither do I have another account. Before opening this account a few days ago I edited wikipedia simply under my home IP address. I haven't doubled up accounts at any point, or pretended to be different people (is that what sock puppetry is?).
In fact, this case is completely spurious, and tiger (sp) knows this. In fact this is simply a personal attack on me because we disagreed on a previous topic. As such, I think that his behaviour should be investigated. What is wikipedia's policy on unprovoked personal attacks?
Py0alb (talk) 14:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- So just for clarification, are you asking us to run a checkuser to find out who it is? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)