Sean.hoyland (talk | contribs) |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Comments by EdJohnston: Supply a diff showing the same edit by Firkin Flying Fox and GoGoTob2, 31 days apart |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Or examine the following improbable coincidence at [[Talk:East_Germany/Archive_4#Capital_city]]. The initial response is from Firkin Flying Fox. The rest was handled by NoCal socks [[User:Jeff Song]] and [[User:Ruby Tuesday ALMWR]]. Note in particular a good example of NoCal's use of sockpuppetry for deception where he said "''there were objections to your edit – first by 87.68.160.34, then by Firkin Flying Fox, then by Alssa1, then by Ruby Tuesday ALMWR, and now me [Jeff Song]''". The editor interaction report for the 3 accounts is [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/editorinteract.cgi?user1=Jeff+Song&user2=Ruby%20Tuesday%20ALMWR&user3=Firkin+Flying+Fox here]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 09:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
Or examine the following improbable coincidence at [[Talk:East_Germany/Archive_4#Capital_city]]. The initial response is from Firkin Flying Fox. The rest was handled by NoCal socks [[User:Jeff Song]] and [[User:Ruby Tuesday ALMWR]]. Note in particular a good example of NoCal's use of sockpuppetry for deception where he said "''there were objections to your edit – first by 87.68.160.34, then by Firkin Flying Fox, then by Alssa1, then by Ruby Tuesday ALMWR, and now me [Jeff Song]''". The editor interaction report for the 3 accounts is [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/editorinteract.cgi?user1=Jeff+Song&user2=Ruby%20Tuesday%20ALMWR&user3=Firkin+Flying+Fox here]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 09:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
=====Comment by EdJohnston===== |
|||
*@DoRD: Here Firkin Flying Fox [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Students_for_Justice_in_Palestine&diff=prev&oldid=576209250 removed] the same passage from the SJP article as had [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Students_for_Justice_in_Palestine&diff=571803869&oldid=571802529 previously been removed] (31 days earlier) by [[User:GoGoTob2]]. Later GoGoTob2 was blocked as a sock of NoCal100 by [[User:Elockid]], who marked this as a checkuserblock. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 15:36, 9 October 2013
NoCal100
- NoCal100 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
08 October 2013
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Csi.southpark (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Firkin Flying Fox (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Jennifer Worth (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
These might not just be NoCal's sock puppets, there is a very good chance User:AndresHerutJaim could also be running some, or all of these accounts. A comparison of articles edited, ongoing practice by these two of hounding my edits, the sudden reawakening of these sleeper accounts, plus an obviously experienced user makes these accounts obviously linked to one of the many pro israeli extremist sockpuppeters. Sepsis II (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Sepsis II (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
User:GoGoTob2 is a blocked NoCal sock. Both Firkin Flying Fox and GoGoTob2 have edited the same 2 obscure articles in the ARBPIA topic area (see [1]). Firkin Flying Fox may also related to throwaway account User:Itch Eye Bear, also used to target Sepsis II, judging from the similarity between the edit warring reports they filed here and here. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Or examine the following improbable coincidence at Talk:East_Germany/Archive_4#Capital_city. The initial response is from Firkin Flying Fox. The rest was handled by NoCal socks User:Jeff Song and User:Ruby Tuesday ALMWR. Note in particular a good example of NoCal's use of sockpuppetry for deception where he said "there were objections to your edit – first by 87.68.160.34, then by Firkin Flying Fox, then by Alssa1, then by Ruby Tuesday ALMWR, and now me [Jeff Song]". The editor interaction report for the 3 accounts is here. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Comment by EdJohnston
- @DoRD: Here Firkin Flying Fox removed the same passage from the SJP article as had previously been removed (31 days earlier) by User:GoGoTob2. Later GoGoTob2 was blocked as a sock of NoCal100 by User:Elockid, who marked this as a checkuserblock. EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Check declined by a checkuser. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
- At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
- At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
- In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. —DoRD (talk) 00:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)