HelloAnnyong (talk | contribs) m re, fix |
q is sleeper |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''Note''': (to clerk?) - did the CU action here check for possible sleeper accounts? If not - given the background - I suggest that happens prior to archiving this. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 15:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC) |
'''Note''': (to clerk?) - did the CU action here check for possible sleeper accounts? If not - given the background - I suggest that happens prior to archiving this. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 15:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Based on TNX's comments on ANI, yes, a CU was done. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 15:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC) |
:Based on TNX's comments on ANI, yes, a CU was done. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 15:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Yes; my question is, whether xe checked for sleepers. I'll ask Tnxman307 to comment here. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 17:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!-- comments above here --> |
<!-- comments above here --> |
Revision as of 17:54, 23 March 2011
NickSoroka
- NickSoroka (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
This is related to yet another re-creation of the deleted David Cote biography. Per TnXMan,
- Davecotefilm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and
- JulieLeon80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
are likely matches to each other. I'm adding this to the NickSoroka SPI page at TnXMan's suggestion, to collect the info in one place.[1] I think no action is being requested other than archiving.
Further info: ANI thread.
75.57.242.120 (talk) 09:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- These accounts will also need blocking. TNXMan 21:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Both are blocked and tagged. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The following comment from Tnxman307 is copied over from the ANI thread, from [2], for clarity (and to show a CU check took place) Chzz ► 15:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Note: (to clerk?) - did the CU action here check for possible sleeper accounts? If not - given the background - I suggest that happens prior to archiving this. Thanks, Chzz ► 15:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Based on TNX's comments on ANI, yes, a CU was done. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)