MBernal615 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
||
There is no evidence for this charge. |
|||
There has been no abuse of multiple accounts, disruptive edits, or efforts to distort consensus or circumvent policy. |
|||
There has been no recruitment of proxies to sway consensus. |
|||
The '''history of my editing''' will speak for itself. It is not limited to Adam Clayton Powell IV, and it is always well-documented (sources, newspaper articles, in-line references) and constructive. I have not engaged in edit wars or other negative behavior. |
|||
This accusation appears to be in bad faith -- made by an editor '''Sole Soul''' who has repeatedly PAGE-BLANKED the entire article of '''Adam Clayton Powell IV.''' At the moment I write this, the article remains Page-Blanked by Sole Soul, and his/her editing should be examined. |
|||
Sole Soul also submitted inaccurate facts. NelsonDenis248 was not blocked on January 30, 2009. |
|||
Again, this charge is '''not backed by the evidence.''' |
|||
[[User:MBernal615|MBernal615]] ([[User talk:MBernal615|talk]]) 06:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
Revision as of 06:37, 7 February 2010
Nelsondenis248
- Nelsondenis248 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: suspected
Report date February 7 2010, 06:03 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- MBernal615 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Sole Soul
An IP user apparently related to Adam Clayton Powell IV (politician) claimed that a political rival called Nelson Antonio Denis and his agents are inserting malicious contents to his agent article. A user named Nelsondenis248 (talk · contribs) (notice the similarity between the 2 names) was blocked in 30 January 2009 for "Attacks to Adam Clayton Powell IV (politician), WP:BLP violations". A user named MBernal615 (talk · contribs) whose first edit was to create the article Nelson Antonio Denis, started to edit Adam Clayton Powell page in July 2009. The user edits are almost all negative.
After a user reported the BLP violation in Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Adam_Clayton_Powell_IV_.28politician.29, I stubbed Adam Clayton Powell IV (politician). MBernal615 restored the page as I'm writing this report. Sole Soul (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Note: Even the picture of Adam Clayton Powell uploaded by MBernal615 is unflattering to any politician and sends a clear message. Compare it with the picture for Nelson Antonio Denis they uploaded. Sole Soul (talk) 06:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
There is no evidence for this charge.
There has been no abuse of multiple accounts, disruptive edits, or efforts to distort consensus or circumvent policy.
There has been no recruitment of proxies to sway consensus.
The history of my editing will speak for itself. It is not limited to Adam Clayton Powell IV, and it is always well-documented (sources, newspaper articles, in-line references) and constructive. I have not engaged in edit wars or other negative behavior.
This accusation appears to be in bad faith -- made by an editor Sole Soul who has repeatedly PAGE-BLANKED the entire article of Adam Clayton Powell IV. At the moment I write this, the article remains Page-Blanked by Sole Soul, and his/her editing should be examined.
Sole Soul also submitted inaccurate facts. NelsonDenis248 was not blocked on January 30, 2009.
Again, this charge is not backed by the evidence.
MBernal615 (talk) 06:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. serious BLP violation Requested by Sole Soul (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Nelsondenis248 is completely stale as the last edit was in 2008. I believe it might be a duck. --Bsadowski1 06:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)