Content deleted Content added
ScottyBerg (talk | contribs) →15 December 2010: twk |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* 216.57.39.35: Similar editing pattern, talk page rhetoric and aggressive POV editing in [[Nelson Antonio Denis]]. See recent canvassing and personal attacks [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marine_69-71&diff=prev&oldid=402435862] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marine_69-71&diff=prev&oldid=402435862] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quazgaa&diff=prev&oldid=402429542] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aristophanes68&diff=prev&oldid=402429019] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marine_69-71&diff=prev&oldid=402428438] instantaneously after major edits to [[Nelson Antonio Denis]], followed by wholesale reversion of the puffery-laden article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nelson_Antonio_Denis&curid=20498782&diff=402446224&oldid=402437854], reinstating unsubstantiated and dubious claims concerning Denis. This article was created and extensively edited by [[User:MBernal615]], an indef blocked meat/sockpuppet of the subject of the article, who also created an attack article on a political opponent. See [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Nelsondenis248/Archive]]. This IP is [[WP:DUCK|obviously]] a sockpuppet, or at the very least a meatpuppet, of this same indef banned editor, again seeking to evade the block and thwart necessary editing to rectify multiple article problems delineated on the talk page. |
* 216.57.39.35: Similar editing pattern, talk page rhetoric and aggressive POV editing in [[Nelson Antonio Denis]]. See recent canvassing and personal attacks [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marine_69-71&diff=prev&oldid=402435862] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marine_69-71&diff=prev&oldid=402435862] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quazgaa&diff=prev&oldid=402429542] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aristophanes68&diff=prev&oldid=402429019] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marine_69-71&diff=prev&oldid=402428438] instantaneously after major edits to [[Nelson Antonio Denis]], followed by wholesale reversion of the puffery-laden article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nelson_Antonio_Denis&curid=20498782&diff=402446224&oldid=402437854], reinstating unsubstantiated and dubious claims concerning Denis. This article was created and extensively edited by [[User:MBernal615]], an indef blocked meat/sockpuppet of the subject of the article, who also created an attack article on a political opponent. See [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Nelsondenis248/Archive]]. This IP is [[WP:DUCK|obviously]] a sockpuppet, or at the very least a meatpuppet, of this same indef banned editor, again seeking to evade the block and thwart necessary editing to rectify multiple article problems delineated on the talk page. |
||
* 69.203.119.66: In March 2010, subsequent to the previous blocks imposed in this case, this IP was blocked for six months on checkuser evidence, apparently in relation to this case based on this[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.203.119.66&diff=349598161&oldid=343364795]. This IP resumed editing the article immediately after 216.57.39.35 commenced its edits today. Previous edit pattern was similar to the other socks. |
* 69.203.119.66: In March 2010, subsequent to the previous blocks imposed in this case, this IP was blocked for six months on checkuser evidence, apparently in relation to this case based on this[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.203.119.66&diff=349598161&oldid=343364795]. This IP resumed editing the article immediately after 216.57.39.35 commenced its edits today. Previous edit pattern was similar to the other socks. |
||
[[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 01:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC) |
[[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 01:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Response from 69.203.119.66''': As far as I know, an editor may edit on Wikipedia without being called a sockpuppet. The article(s) which I choose to edit do not make me or any other editor a sockpuppet. There is no creation or abuse of multiple accounts on my part. There is no evidence here, of sockpuppetry. The fact that I contribute to an article (with no account or IP abuse) does not make me a sockpuppet. Finally, the "editing" which triggered this report was my correction of a typo, the correction of a mis-spelled word. I don't believe that warrants a sockpuppetry charge, and being banned from Wikipedia. |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
Revision as of 08:34, 15 December 2010
Nelsondenis248
- Nelsondenis248 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nelsondenis248/Archive.
15 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
- 216.57.39.35: Similar editing pattern, talk page rhetoric and aggressive POV editing in Nelson Antonio Denis. See recent canvassing and personal attacks [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] instantaneously after major edits to Nelson Antonio Denis, followed by wholesale reversion of the puffery-laden article [6], reinstating unsubstantiated and dubious claims concerning Denis. This article was created and extensively edited by User:MBernal615, an indef blocked meat/sockpuppet of the subject of the article, who also created an attack article on a political opponent. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Nelsondenis248/Archive. This IP is obviously a sockpuppet, or at the very least a meatpuppet, of this same indef banned editor, again seeking to evade the block and thwart necessary editing to rectify multiple article problems delineated on the talk page.
- 69.203.119.66: In March 2010, subsequent to the previous blocks imposed in this case, this IP was blocked for six months on checkuser evidence, apparently in relation to this case based on this[7]. This IP resumed editing the article immediately after 216.57.39.35 commenced its edits today. Previous edit pattern was similar to the other socks.
ScottyBerg (talk) 01:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Response from 69.203.119.66: As far as I know, an editor may edit on Wikipedia without being called a sockpuppet. The article(s) which I choose to edit do not make me or any other editor a sockpuppet. There is no creation or abuse of multiple accounts on my part. There is no evidence here, of sockpuppetry. The fact that I contribute to an article (with no account or IP abuse) does not make me a sockpuppet. Finally, the "editing" which triggered this report was my correction of a typo, the correction of a mis-spelled word. I don't believe that warrants a sockpuppetry charge, and being banned from Wikipedia.
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.