m →Suspected sockpuppets: oops |
checked |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
||
{{confirmed}} that {{checkuser|1=OmarKhayyam}} = {{checkuser|InternetIsSeriousBusiness}}. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 00:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 00:34, 12 November 2010
Ledenierhomme
- Ledenierhomme (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
12 November 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- OmarKhayyam (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Nableezy
The last editor blocked as a sock of Ledenierhomme, InternetIsSeriousBusiness (talk · contribs) was blocked on 00:05, 5 November 2010. This account was created 13.5 hours later. Both the InternetIsSeriousBusiness and the OmarKhayyam account voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamas and the Taliban analogy (both voting keep). The latest account has lately focused on Iraqi Turkmens, a common article with Ledenierhomme. This and past accounts also have a habit of removing tags from articles without explanation, see OK and IISB. There is another giveaway in the behavior of editors, but I would prefer not to share it publicly. If a clerk feels this evidence is not sufficient for a CU I would be glad to email additional evidence. nableezy - 00:22, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Auto-generated every six hours.
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Confirmed that OmarKhayyam (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) = InternetIsSeriousBusiness (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). TNXMan 00:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)