→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: added link in block log |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*Not much point in blocking random IP's with no history. The more useful approach would be to protect the page, which I see [[User:El C]] has already done, so closing this with no action. If any of those IPs show up again, we can consider blocking them at that time. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 18:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC) |
*Not much point in blocking random IP's with no history. The more useful approach would be to protect the page, which I see [[User:El C]] has already done, so closing this with no action. If any of those IPs show up again, we can consider blocking them at that time. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 18:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
::{{Ping|RoySmith}} The problem is not the IPs but Kazemita1, who is coming out of their block in a couple of days and seems to be behind these edits even though they're supposed to be blocked. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 20:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC) |
::{{Ping|RoySmith}} The problem is not the IPs but Kazemita1, who is coming out of their block in a couple of days and seems to be behind these edits even though they're supposed to be blocked. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 20:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::{{re|Alex-h}} Ah, I see. For the moment, the page is protected, so the IPs won't be able to do any more harm. Let's just wait and see what happens when the block expires. If he goes back to his disruptive behavior, I imagine the next block will be for a considerably longer time span. I've added a note into the block log so any future admin who goes to block him will know about this exchange. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 20:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 20:25, 7 January 2020
Kazemita1
- Kazemita1 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
07 January 2020
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
A few weeks ago I filed a SPI that involved User:Kazemita1, who was blocked on December 26th, 2019 for edit warring. Since then several IPs have been removing the same identical information that Kazemita1 was blocked for removing:
Removing "Those who back the MEK describe the group as proponents of "a free and democratic Iran" that could become the next government there."
Removing "The book is about the 1988 massacres of political prisoners in Iran, and explains that about 30,000 people were executed, with the majority being MEK members"
and replacing it with "on this topic"
.
The behavioural evidence seems identical. Alex-h (talk) 15:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Not much point in blocking random IP's with no history. The more useful approach would be to protect the page, which I see User:El C has already done, so closing this with no action. If any of those IPs show up again, we can consider blocking them at that time. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: The problem is not the IPs but Kazemita1, who is coming out of their block in a couple of days and seems to be behind these edits even though they're supposed to be blocked. Alex-h (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Alex-h: Ah, I see. For the moment, the page is protected, so the IPs won't be able to do any more harm. Let's just wait and see what happens when the block expires. If he goes back to his disruptive behavior, I imagine the next block will be for a considerably longer time span. I've added a note into the block log so any future admin who goes to block him will know about this exchange. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: The problem is not the IPs but Kazemita1, who is coming out of their block in a couple of days and seems to be behind these edits even though they're supposed to be blocked. Alex-h (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)